← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2610.36340 · v2
CrowdCC: Jointly Benchmarking Corruption Robustness and Deployment Quantization in Crowd Counting
首次提交 2026-10-27 06:08
版本更新 2026-10-29 06:02
雷达观测 2026-10-30 11:25
摘要
Crowd-counting models deployed on edge devices face two challenges: inputs are degraded along the capture and transmission pipeline, while models are often quantized to satisfy resource constraints of the edge. Yet corruption robustness and deployment quantization are typically evaluated separately. We introduce CrowdCC, a controlled benchmark that jointly evaluates these effects across 23 deployment-motivated corruptions at three severity levels, four crowd-counting datasets, and 26 models. We evaluate TensorRT engines at FP32, FP16, and post-training INT8 precision on an A100 GPU, alongside throughput and energy measurements on corresponding Jetson Orin~NX configurations. The corruptions span six families, with head annotations adjusted when geometry or visibility changes. Our results show that capture-chain corruptions consistently cause the largest degradation across evaluated models, while crowd density affects absolute and relative errors differently. Accuracy on clean images does not reliably predict performance on the corresponding corrupted images. INT8 changes corruption robustness more than FP16, without a consistent direction, and does not consistently improve latency or energy efficiency. INT8 inference efficiency is strongly associated with reformat overhead in the compiled engine, with slowdowns also observed under limited INT8 coverage. Precision changes corrupted-error rankings and robustness--cost frontiers, highlighting the need to consider corruption robustness and deployment cost jointly when selecting models and precision. The code is available at https://github.com/Tulane-Computer-Architecture-Systems/CrowdCC-Release.
作者备注：Accepted in WACV 2027; Project page: https://numan947.github.io/research/crowdcc/
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v2 · 2026-10-29 06:02 · 最新观测版本
CrowdCC: Jointly Benchmarking Corruption Robustness and Deployment Quantization in Crowd Counting
Crowd-counting models deployed on edge devices face two challenges: inputs are degraded along the capture and transmission pipeline, while models are often quantized to satisfy resource constraints of the edge. Yet corruption robustness and deployment quantization are typically evaluated separately. We introduce CrowdCC, a controlled benchmark that jointly evaluates these effects across 23 deployment-motivated corruptions at three severity levels, four crowd-counting datasets, and 26 models. We evaluate TensorRT engines at FP32, FP16, and post-training INT8 precision on an A100 GPU, alongside throughput and energy measurements on corresponding Jetson Orin~NX configurations. The corruptions span six families, with head annotations adjusted when geometry or visibility changes. Our results show that capture-chain corruptions consistently cause the largest degradation across evaluated models, while crowd density affects absolute and relative errors differently. Accuracy on clean images does not reliably predict performance on the corresponding corrupted images. INT8 changes corruption robustness more than FP16, without a consistent direction, and does not consistently improve latency or energy efficiency. INT8 inference efficiency is strongly associated with reformat overhead in the compiled engine, with slowdowns also observed under limited INT8 coverage. Precision changes corrupted-error rankings and robustness--cost frontiers, highlighting the need to consider corruption robustness and deployment cost jointly when selecting models and precision. The code is available at https://github.com/Tulane-Computer-Architecture-Systems/CrowdCC-Release.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗v1 · 2026-10-27 06:08
CrowdCC: Jointly Benchmarking Corruption Robustness and Deployment Quantization in Crowd Counting
Crowd-counting models deployed on edge devices face two shifts: inputs are degraded along the capture and transmission pipeline, while models are quantized to satisfy resource constraints. Yet corruption robustness and deployment quantization are typically evaluated separately. We introduce CrowdCC, a controlled corruption benchmark that jointly evaluates these effects using 23 deployment-motivated corruptions at three severity levels, four crowd-counting datasets, and 26 models using A100 TensorRT engines at FP32, FP16, and post-training INT8 precision, paired with throughput and energy measurements from corresponding Jetson Orin NX configurations. The corruptions span six families, with head annotations adjusted when geometry or visibility changes. Our evaluation shows that capture-chain corruptions consistently produce the largest degradation across the evaluated models, while crowd density affects absolute and relative error differently. Clean accuracy does not fully predict corrupted performance. INT8 alters corruption robustness substantially more than FP16, with no systematic direction, and does not consistently improve latency or energy. INT8 inference efficiency is strongly associated with reformat overhead in the compiled engine, while slowdowns are also observed under limited INT8 coverage. Precision changes corrupted-error rankings and robustness-cost frontiers, showing why model selection must consider corruption robustness and measured deployment cost together. The code is available at https://github.com/Tulane-Computer-Architecture-Systems/CrowdCC-Release.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗