跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.37456 · v1

An Input Skip Can Reparameterize a VAE Without Improving the Generator

首次提交 2026-10-27 23:57
版本更新 2026-10-27 23:57
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:34
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

An input skip can reduce reconstruction error while leaving a model's distribution of new samples unchanged. For a Gaussian variational autoencoder (VAE) with constant input skip $0\leqα<1$, a model without a skip can be written in skip form by multiplying its decoder output by $b=1-α$ and its noise variance by $b^2$. The distribution of observations and latent variables and its exact generative scores stay the same, while reconstruction mean squared error (MSE) is multiplied by $b^2$. Separate training can produce different generators because optimization depends on the parameter coordinates. In a Gaussian experiment with known density, changing skip and observation variance together reduces MSE but worsens energy score and the estimate of negative log density from importance sampling. On seven annual Deep-ocean Assessment and Reporting of Tsunamis (DART) records, energy score differences at the same observation variance have both signs on four original records and favor the skip on three records from 2018. Probabilistic principal component analysis (PPCA) has lower mean energy scores than every neural DART fit. With the encoder and decoder kept the same, estimating observation variance from training reconstruction error can also worsen energy score. Assessing generation requires more than reconstruction error.

作者备注:Accepted at NeurIPS 2026 Principles of Generative Modeling (PriGM) Workshop. Available at: https://github.com/magnaprog/vae-skip-reparam

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-10-27 23:57 · 最新观测版本

An Input Skip Can Reparameterize a VAE Without Improving the Generator

An input skip can reduce reconstruction error while leaving a model's distribution of new samples unchanged. For a Gaussian variational autoencoder (VAE) with constant input skip $0\leqα<1$, a model without a skip can be written in skip form by multiplying its decoder output by $b=1-α$ and its noise variance by $b^2$. The distribution of observations and latent variables and its exact generative scores stay the same, while reconstruction mean squared error (MSE) is multiplied by $b^2$. Separate training can produce different generators because optimization depends on the parameter coordinates. In a Gaussian experiment with known density, changing skip and observation variance together reduces MSE but worsens energy score and the estimate of negative log density from importance sampling. On seven annual Deep-ocean Assessment and Reporting of Tsunamis (DART) records, energy score differences at the same observation variance have both signs on four original records and favor the skip on three records from 2018. Probabilistic principal component analysis (PPCA) has lower mean energy scores than every neural DART fit. With the encoder and decoder kept the same, estimating observation variance from training reconstruction error can also worsen energy score. Assessing generation requires more than reconstruction error.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗