跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.38106 · v1

TGTV: An Interpretable Framework for UAV Fault Detection and Traceability via Spatiotemporal Graph Learning and Large Language Models

首次提交 2026-10-28 08:44
版本更新 2026-10-28 08:44
雷达观测 2026-10-30 10:23
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles experience operating-condition transitions, asynchronous sensor sampling, and control-system compensation that can obscure fault signatures. Existing temporal detection methods have limited capacity to represent coupled faults across subsystems, track their evolution, and constrain language-model diagnoses with quantitative evidence. This paper proposes TGTV, an interpretable fault detection and traceability framework that integrates spatiotemporal graph learning with a large language model. A temporal convolutional network and a graph attention network with weighted fused adjacency extract multiscale temporal patterns and spatial dependencies among sensors. A hybrid temporal Transformer and variational autoencoder then evaluates window-level anomalies using prediction errors and reconstruction probabilities. Continuous-time Shapley attribution identifies critical sensors and high-contribution intervals while preserving the temporal continuity of fault evolution. A structured evidence package combines detection results, graph relationships, temporal attribution, sensor attribution, and operating context. An evidence-constrained diagnosis protocol uses this package to generate flight-level conclusions with traceable evidence identifiers. Cross-flight holdout experiments on the public ALFA fixed-wing flight dataset yield a window-level area under the precision-recall curve of 0.976, accuracy of 0.973, recall of 0.902, and F1 score of 0.920. Flight-level fault diagnosis achieves recall of 0.943 and an F1 score of 0.944. These results demonstrate accurate anomaly detection and quantitatively supported fault-tracing cues, providing a basis for interpretable post-flight fault review and analysis.

作者备注:21 pages, 8 figures, 4 tables. Submitted to IEEE Sensors Journal

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-10-28 08:44 · 最新观测版本

TGTV: An Interpretable Framework for UAV Fault Detection and Traceability via Spatiotemporal Graph Learning and Large Language Models

Fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles experience operating-condition transitions, asynchronous sensor sampling, and control-system compensation that can obscure fault signatures. Existing temporal detection methods have limited capacity to represent coupled faults across subsystems, track their evolution, and constrain language-model diagnoses with quantitative evidence. This paper proposes TGTV, an interpretable fault detection and traceability framework that integrates spatiotemporal graph learning with a large language model. A temporal convolutional network and a graph attention network with weighted fused adjacency extract multiscale temporal patterns and spatial dependencies among sensors. A hybrid temporal Transformer and variational autoencoder then evaluates window-level anomalies using prediction errors and reconstruction probabilities. Continuous-time Shapley attribution identifies critical sensors and high-contribution intervals while preserving the temporal continuity of fault evolution. A structured evidence package combines detection results, graph relationships, temporal attribution, sensor attribution, and operating context. An evidence-constrained diagnosis protocol uses this package to generate flight-level conclusions with traceable evidence identifiers. Cross-flight holdout experiments on the public ALFA fixed-wing flight dataset yield a window-level area under the precision-recall curve of 0.976, accuracy of 0.973, recall of 0.902, and F1 score of 0.920. Flight-level fault diagnosis achieves recall of 0.943 and an F1 score of 0.944. These results demonstrate accurate anomaly detection and quantitatively supported fault-tracing cues, providing a basis for interpretable post-flight fault review and analysis.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗