跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.38176 · v1

Minimum Sufficient Communication for Independent Behaviour Tree Robot Teams

首次提交 2026-10-28 10:25
版本更新 2026-10-28 10:25
雷达观测 2026-10-30 09:53
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We present an experimental framework for determining sufficient communication in robot teams running fixed, independent Behaviour Trees with private blackboards. Within a declared policy family, we vary message content and admission frequency and measure traffic in recipient-weighted bits per robot decision. A dense sweep identifies candidate policies for comparison with full-state communication. We retest selected candidates and the reference on fresh, paired scenarios, using one-sided simultaneous confidence bounds to assess whether success remains within five percentage points of the full-state reference. The bounds also assess whether tested cheaper policies can be ruled out as insufficient. Depending on the evidence, the framework reports an exact minimum, a positive bracket, a sufficient upper bound, or an unresolved boundary. Experiments with eight content policies across four warehouse conditions identify zero communication as the exact minimum under low contention. In the scaled condition, the no-release policy at gate $q=0.992222$ is confirmed sufficient, achieving 96.33% success at an estimated rate of 738.55 bits per robot decision, or 0.544% of full-state traffic. The positive minimum remains unresolved. These claims apply only to the declared policy family, sampled gate values and operating conditions.

作者备注:10 pages; accepted for presentation at the Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation (ACRA 2026)

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-10-28 10:25 · 最新观测版本

Minimum Sufficient Communication for Independent Behaviour Tree Robot Teams

We present an experimental framework for determining sufficient communication in robot teams running fixed, independent Behaviour Trees with private blackboards. Within a declared policy family, we vary message content and admission frequency and measure traffic in recipient-weighted bits per robot decision. A dense sweep identifies candidate policies for comparison with full-state communication. We retest selected candidates and the reference on fresh, paired scenarios, using one-sided simultaneous confidence bounds to assess whether success remains within five percentage points of the full-state reference. The bounds also assess whether tested cheaper policies can be ruled out as insufficient. Depending on the evidence, the framework reports an exact minimum, a positive bracket, a sufficient upper bound, or an unresolved boundary. Experiments with eight content policies across four warehouse conditions identify zero communication as the exact minimum under low contention. In the scaled condition, the no-release policy at gate $q=0.992222$ is confirmed sufficient, achieving 96.33% success at an estimated rate of 738.55 bits per robot decision, or 0.544% of full-state traffic. The positive minimum remains unresolved. These claims apply only to the declared policy family, sampled gate values and operating conditions.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗