← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2610.38632 · v1
The use of post-quantum cryptography in the automotive context
首次提交 2026-10-28 18:49
版本更新 2026-10-28 18:49
雷达观测 2026-10-30 10:22
摘要
This study comparatively evaluates post-quantum cryptography (PQC) in automotive communication scenarios, considering the threat posed by quantum algorithms such as Shor's and Grover's algorithms. The simulations use OMNeT++, Veins, INET, and SUMO on two hardware platforms and examine ML-KEM/CRYSTALS-Kyber, ML-DSA/CRYSTALS-Dilithium, and FALCON. ML-KEM and ML-DSA are finalized NIST standards, whereas FALCON is a NIST-selected candidate pending final standardization. The evaluation considers a rural V2V scenario and an urban V2X scenario supported by a roadside unit. Kyber exhibits low {key encapsulation mechanism (KEM)}\color{black} operation latency, Dilithium provides balanced signature performance, and FALCON has high key-generation and signing costs but efficient verification. The results are interpreted as a comparative assessment among the evaluated PQC schemes under the reported simulation conditions; {a conventional ECDSA/ECDH baseline measured in the same simulation setup is also reported for reference.}\color{black} The resulting dataset can support future studies of cryptographic selection in automotive systems.
作者备注：24 pages
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-10-28 18:49 · 最新观测版本
The use of post-quantum cryptography in the automotive context
This study comparatively evaluates post-quantum cryptography (PQC) in automotive communication scenarios, considering the threat posed by quantum algorithms such as Shor's and Grover's algorithms. The simulations use OMNeT++, Veins, INET, and SUMO on two hardware platforms and examine ML-KEM/CRYSTALS-Kyber, ML-DSA/CRYSTALS-Dilithium, and FALCON. ML-KEM and ML-DSA are finalized NIST standards, whereas FALCON is a NIST-selected candidate pending final standardization. The evaluation considers a rural V2V scenario and an urban V2X scenario supported by a roadside unit. Kyber exhibits low {key encapsulation mechanism (KEM)}\color{black} operation latency, Dilithium provides balanced signature performance, and FALCON has high key-generation and signing costs but efficient verification. The results are interpreted as a comparative assessment among the evaluated PQC schemes under the reported simulation conditions; {a conventional ECDSA/ECDH baseline measured in the same simulation setup is also reported for reference.}\color{black} The resulting dataset can support future studies of cryptographic selection in automotive systems.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗