跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.39016 · v1

Implicit Reasoning in Transformers: Bridging the Compositionality Gap in GPT-2-like Models

首次提交 2026-10-29 06:44
版本更新 2026-10-29 06:44
雷达观测 2026-10-30 11:25
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Compositional generalization remains a persistent limitation of transformer language models: even when a model learns to combine known facts correctly in-distribution (ID), the same compositional mechanism may fail when applied to out-of-distribution (OOD) knowledge. We investigate this compositionality gap in a controlled two-hop reasoning setting using a GPT-2-like transformer model trained from scratch. Building on prior work identifying a circuit associated with compositional generalization, we test whether the failure of OOD transfer is related to how atomic knowledge is structurally exposed during training. We modify the training distribution by presenting both ID and OOD atomic facts in a format positionally aligned with the second-hop retrieval step of the learned compositional circuit, without modifying the model architecture or adding OOD compositional supervision. Under this intervention, the model successfully transfers the learned ID compositional behaviour to held-out OOD atomic facts, closing the observed compositionality gap in the controlled setting. Our results provide evidence that the observed compositionality gap is not a fundamental architecture limitation and that it can be overcome through mechanistically informed training distribution design.

作者备注:Code available at: https://github.com/Davide011/implicit-reasoning-bridging-compositionality-gap

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-10-29 06:44 · 最新观测版本

Implicit Reasoning in Transformers: Bridging the Compositionality Gap in GPT-2-like Models

Compositional generalization remains a persistent limitation of transformer language models: even when a model learns to combine known facts correctly in-distribution (ID), the same compositional mechanism may fail when applied to out-of-distribution (OOD) knowledge. We investigate this compositionality gap in a controlled two-hop reasoning setting using a GPT-2-like transformer model trained from scratch. Building on prior work identifying a circuit associated with compositional generalization, we test whether the failure of OOD transfer is related to how atomic knowledge is structurally exposed during training. We modify the training distribution by presenting both ID and OOD atomic facts in a format positionally aligned with the second-hop retrieval step of the learned compositional circuit, without modifying the model architecture or adding OOD compositional supervision. Under this intervention, the model successfully transfers the learned ID compositional behaviour to held-out OOD atomic facts, closing the observed compositionality gap in the controlled setting. Our results provide evidence that the observed compositionality gap is not a fundamental architecture limitation and that it can be overcome through mechanistically informed training distribution design.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗