跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.39330 · v1

Can Image Agents Complete Visual Commissions? A Benchmark and Modular Framework

首次提交 2026-10-29 12:26
版本更新 2026-10-29 12:26
雷达观测 2026-10-30 11:25
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Visual commissions require image agents to integrate heterogeneous source materials, preserve requirements across dependent stages, and produce coordinated deliverables. Existing evaluations examine specific capabilities and execution settings, leaving end-to-end commission completion less understood. We introduce Visual Commission Bench (VCB), comprising 600 tasks across 12 categories and three complementary tiers, from capability-focused tasks to complete commissions. VCB uses 5,039 requirement checks and separate visual quality ratings to assess content correctness, visual realization, constraint preservation, and delivery completeness without prescribing an internal workflow. We present V-Protocol, a reference agent that dynamically composes reusable task, cognitive, and expression modules at inference time. Task modules organize delivery, cognitive modules derive content, and expression modules guide visual realization. The modules exchange structured intermediate artifacts, while a shared execution harness tracks artifact revisions and dependencies, manages tool execution, and checks completion. With the same controller and image generator as the agent baselines, V-Protocol achieves 69.0\% strict task success on VCB, compared with 42.0\% for SCOPE. On Mind-Bench, strict accuracy increases from 39.2\% to 45.4\%.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-10-29 12:26 · 最新观测版本

Can Image Agents Complete Visual Commissions? A Benchmark and Modular Framework

Visual commissions require image agents to integrate heterogeneous source materials, preserve requirements across dependent stages, and produce coordinated deliverables. Existing evaluations examine specific capabilities and execution settings, leaving end-to-end commission completion less understood. We introduce Visual Commission Bench (VCB), comprising 600 tasks across 12 categories and three complementary tiers, from capability-focused tasks to complete commissions. VCB uses 5,039 requirement checks and separate visual quality ratings to assess content correctness, visual realization, constraint preservation, and delivery completeness without prescribing an internal workflow. We present V-Protocol, a reference agent that dynamically composes reusable task, cognitive, and expression modules at inference time. Task modules organize delivery, cognitive modules derive content, and expression modules guide visual realization. The modules exchange structured intermediate artifacts, while a shared execution harness tracks artifact revisions and dependencies, manages tool execution, and checks completion. With the same controller and image generator as the agent baselines, V-Protocol achieves 69.0\% strict task success on VCB, compared with 42.0\% for SCOPE. On Mind-Bench, strict accuracy increases from 39.2\% to 45.4\%.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗