跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.40587 · v1

Beyond Ground Truth: A Heuristic Unsupervised Quality Assurance Engine for Diagnosing Calibrational Blindness in Dental Segmentation

首次提交 2026-10-30 01:47
版本更新 2026-10-30 01:47
雷达观测 2026-10-30 13:28
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

In real-world clinical settings, dental X-ray segmentation using deep learning methods suffers from reliability issues. Even when the segmentation quality is bad, deep learning models show high confidence in their predictions (calibrational blindness). Moreover, in real use, doctors do not have ground-truth masks to check their accuracy. To address this problem, we introduce a simple quality-checking engine called HUS-QA with three stages. We train it on the PRAD (Periapical Dental X-ray) dataset to build our SimCLR self-supervised ResNet-18 U-Net model, which generates the segmentation mask and then evaluates its quality. Our HUS-QA checks the segmentation mask quality without a ground-truth mask. Prediction confidence, edge sharpness, shape connectivity, and area-size penalty are the simple indicators considered in this research. Results show that standard confidence methods fail (r = -0.1394, p = 1.7864e-3, ROC AUC = 0.4275). By contrast, our HUS-QA shows a positive correlation with actual Dice scores (r = 0.4647, p = 3.7510e-28) and achieves a strong ROC-AUC of 0.8405. Therefore, HUS-QA serves as a practical tool for clinical quality control.

作者备注:Accepted at 11th IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Science and Data Engineering (IEEE CSDE 2026), Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh. Copyright 2026 IEEE. 5 pages, 5 figures, 3 tables

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

提出无需真实标注的启发式质量检查引擎 HUS-QA,用于评估牙科 X 光分割掩膜质量并诊断模型的校准盲区。

正在读取账号与研究记录…

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-10-30 01:47 · 最新观测版本

Beyond Ground Truth: A Heuristic Unsupervised Quality Assurance Engine for Diagnosing Calibrational Blindness in Dental Segmentation

In real-world clinical settings, dental X-ray segmentation using deep learning methods suffers from reliability issues. Even when the segmentation quality is bad, deep learning models show high confidence in their predictions (calibrational blindness). Moreover, in real use, doctors do not have ground-truth masks to check their accuracy. To address this problem, we introduce a simple quality-checking engine called HUS-QA with three stages. We train it on the PRAD (Periapical Dental X-ray) dataset to build our SimCLR self-supervised ResNet-18 U-Net model, which generates the segmentation mask and then evaluates its quality. Our HUS-QA checks the segmentation mask quality without a ground-truth mask. Prediction confidence, edge sharpness, shape connectivity, and area-size penalty are the simple indicators considered in this research. Results show that standard confidence methods fail (r = -0.1394, p = 1.7864e-3, ROC AUC = 0.4275). By contrast, our HUS-QA shows a positive correlation with actual Dice scores (r = 0.4647, p = 3.7510e-28) and achieves a strong ROC-AUC of 0.8405. Therefore, HUS-QA serves as a practical tool for clinical quality control.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗