跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.41536 · v2

DAPS: Dependency-Aware Premise Selection for LLM Theorem Proving

首次提交 2026-10-30 18:28
版本更新 2026-11-07 23:07
雷达观测 2026-11-10 11:14
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

LLM-based theorem proving in Lean 4 has advanced rapidly, but provers are difficult to leverage newly contributed lemmas, because retrieval skews toward popular foundational lemmas, leaving the right premises buried among hundreds of thousands of candidates. Existing neural selectors rank candidates by semantic similarity, with three intrinsic limitations: frequency-skewed retrieval, isolated pairwise ranking, and degradation on out-of-distribution queries such as competition problems and informal language. Given that mathematics is structured by dependencies rather than similarities, we restore this signal to both the training data and the model. We curate two underused dependency resources. We conduct the first systematic mining of 53 Lean Blueprint projects, a previously untapped corpus of 3,805 manually curated informal+formal nodes that capture rare, research-level premises absent from Mathlib4. We further pair it with the extraction of comprehensive, typed, multi-level Mathlib4 dependencies. We then introduce DAPS, a dependency-aware premise selector with a structural neighborhood encoder, a group-level contrastive objective, and a Mathlib-then-Blueprint adaptation procedure. DAPS reaches 78.74 Recall@16 on Mathlib4-Heldout (+11.41 over the strong selector LeanHammer) and widens the margin to 7xrecall on competition-style queries. Downstream, its selected premises raise Goedel-Prover-V2-8B Pass@4 on miniF2F-test from 49.90 to 54.03 and improve all four general-purpose LLMs on the informal IMO-ProofBench (up to +11.4% relative). Project page: https://daps-eth.github.io/.

期刊信息:NeurIPS 2026

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-07 23:07 · 最新观测版本

DAPS: Dependency-Aware Premise Selection for LLM Theorem Proving

LLM-based theorem proving in Lean 4 has advanced rapidly, but provers are difficult to leverage newly contributed lemmas, because retrieval skews toward popular foundational lemmas, leaving the right premises buried among hundreds of thousands of candidates. Existing neural selectors rank candidates by semantic similarity, with three intrinsic limitations: frequency-skewed retrieval, isolated pairwise ranking, and degradation on out-of-distribution queries such as competition problems and informal language. Given that mathematics is structured by dependencies rather than similarities, we restore this signal to both the training data and the model. We curate two underused dependency resources. We conduct the first systematic mining of 53 Lean Blueprint projects, a previously untapped corpus of 3,805 manually curated informal+formal nodes that capture rare, research-level premises absent from Mathlib4. We further pair it with the extraction of comprehensive, typed, multi-level Mathlib4 dependencies. We then introduce DAPS, a dependency-aware premise selector with a structural neighborhood encoder, a group-level contrastive objective, and a Mathlib-then-Blueprint adaptation procedure. DAPS reaches 78.74 Recall@16 on Mathlib4-Heldout (+11.41 over the strong selector LeanHammer) and widens the margin to 7xrecall on competition-style queries. Downstream, its selected premises raise Goedel-Prover-V2-8B Pass@4 on miniF2F-test from 49.90 to 54.03 and improve all four general-purpose LLMs on the informal IMO-ProofBench (up to +11.4% relative). Project page: https://daps-eth.github.io/.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗