跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.00063 · v2

Where Generated Floor Plans Stop: Calibrated Sample-Level Checks Against a Built Baseline

首次提交 2026-10-13 23:29
版本更新 2026-11-05 05:36
雷达观测 2026-11-06 11:06
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Floor plan generators are judged mainly by Compatibility, a graph edit distance to the requested adjacencies that is near saturation and blind to room shape. Our sample-level protocol calibrates each threshold no standard states at a declared false-rejection rate on real samples and grades them with the same checks. It reports each sample at its first failure, counts samples without a verdict apart, and attributes a stop to the generator or to its representation where a control exists. We apply it, with a production layout solver's checks, to four published generators against two built corpora, RPLAN and Modified Swiss Dwellings (MSD). A squareness check set per room type refuses 5 per cent of RPLAN apartments and 33.7 per cent of House-GAN++ plans. The gap survives resolution, tracing and orientation controls. Pooled over rooms, a Wasserstein distance on squareness orders the generators nearly as the check does but separates House-GAN++ from the built corpora by far less. Taken per plan on the check's worst-room margin, it separates them about fivefold to sevenfold. Within the GAN generators, Compatibility barely predicts which plans pass. We release the checker, which reproduces the solver's first failing check on 3,998 held-out RPLAN plans.

作者备注:v2: retitled and reframed around a calibrated sample-level check protocol; main text shortened and revised, with supporting detail moved to the appendices. 30 pages, 8 figures. Checker released as floorcheck v0.1.1, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23129970. Supplementary material 1 (transfer specification) is the ancillary file anc/specification.pdf

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-05 05:36 · 最新观测版本

Where Generated Floor Plans Stop: Calibrated Sample-Level Checks Against a Built Baseline

Floor plan generators are judged mainly by Compatibility, a graph edit distance to the requested adjacencies that is near saturation and blind to room shape. Our sample-level protocol calibrates each threshold no standard states at a declared false-rejection rate on real samples and grades them with the same checks. It reports each sample at its first failure, counts samples without a verdict apart, and attributes a stop to the generator or to its representation where a control exists. We apply it, with a production layout solver's checks, to four published generators against two built corpora, RPLAN and Modified Swiss Dwellings (MSD). A squareness check set per room type refuses 5 per cent of RPLAN apartments and 33.7 per cent of House-GAN++ plans. The gap survives resolution, tracing and orientation controls. Pooled over rooms, a Wasserstein distance on squareness orders the generators nearly as the check does but separates House-GAN++ from the built corpora by far less. Taken per plan on the check's worst-room margin, it separates them about fivefold to sevenfold. Within the GAN generators, Compatibility barely predicts which plans pass. We release the checker, which reproduces the solver's first failing check on 3,998 held-out RPLAN plans.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗