跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.01314 · v1

Hidden selection rules and amplitude ceilings in quantum Fourier models

首次提交 2026-11-01 06:26
版本更新 2026-11-01 06:26
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:43
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Quantum models with Pauli data encodings compute trigonometric polynomials whatever channels, ancillas and outcome-averaged measurements follow, so their expressivity depends on the Fourier coefficients a circuit can reach. We identify two kinds of structure that settle this before training. An antiunitary time-reversal rule and a unitary reflection rule remove frequencies. For gate-level circuits, deciding whether such a rule exists reduces to a linear system over GF(2), solvable in polynomial time, and the time-reversal rule holds in 17.6% of 6,120 configurations of standard templates. Single-upload encodings cap the top coefficient at $2^{-m}$ for every channel, and we compute the tight ceiling for every frequency and a depth-independent re-uploading bound. Frozen before training, these bounds were never violated on a non-linearity benchmark, and they predicted trained performance on real data. On IBM processors the rule held on a 65-qubit chain, and we switched rule-breaking relaxation noise on and off by design.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-01 06:26 · 最新观测版本

Hidden selection rules and amplitude ceilings in quantum Fourier models

Quantum models with Pauli data encodings compute trigonometric polynomials whatever channels, ancillas and outcome-averaged measurements follow, so their expressivity depends on the Fourier coefficients a circuit can reach. We identify two kinds of structure that settle this before training. An antiunitary time-reversal rule and a unitary reflection rule remove frequencies. For gate-level circuits, deciding whether such a rule exists reduces to a linear system over GF(2), solvable in polynomial time, and the time-reversal rule holds in 17.6% of 6,120 configurations of standard templates. Single-upload encodings cap the top coefficient at $2^{-m}$ for every channel, and we compute the tight ceiling for every frequency and a depth-independent re-uploading bound. Frozen before training, these bounds were never violated on a non-linearity benchmark, and they predicted trained performance on real data. On IBM processors the rule held on a 65-qubit chain, and we switched rule-breaking relaxation noise on and off by design.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗