← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.01578 · v1
Recoverability-Aware Evaluation of Diffusion Video Inpainting and Object Removal
首次提交 2026-11-01 12:59
版本更新 2026-11-01 12:59
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:43
摘要
Video inpainting for object removal is scored over the whole hole, although the background behind the object is visible in other frames of the shot for some hole pixels and in no frame for others. A whole-hole score therefore mixes copying with generation and cannot show which of the two a remover does well. To separate the two, we propose recoverability-stratified evaluation, in which a point tracker run on the clean video labels each hole pixel by whether and how far away it is observed, so that fidelity and temporal stability can be reported per stratum against a copy reference. To reuse the observed content, we also propose evidence-guided sampling (EGS), which blends tracked colors into the clean-latent prediction of a video diffusion remover without training. On DAVIS, the perceptual advantage of three diffusion removers over flow propagation shrinks where the content is visible a few frames away (LPIPS difference-in-differences +0.046 to +0.056 against E2FGVI-HQ), and real paired captures show the same pattern for two of them. Their DAVIS hole warping error is two to four times that of ProPainter, and copying along clean-video tracks lowers their recoverable LPIPS by a quarter to two fifths. EGS closes 43% and 56% of the gap to this copy reference on held-out DAVIS when its colors come from clean-video tracks. With colors tracked on the masked input, a pre-registered confirmation finds no gain on MiniMax-Remover and a loss on ROSE. Diffusion removers thus leave observed content unused on DAVIS, and training-free reuse does not yet hold with tracked evidence.
作者备注：10 pages, 6 figures, 7 tables
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-01 12:59 · 最新观测版本
Recoverability-Aware Evaluation of Diffusion Video Inpainting and Object Removal
Video inpainting for object removal is scored over the whole hole, although the background behind the object is visible in other frames of the shot for some hole pixels and in no frame for others. A whole-hole score therefore mixes copying with generation and cannot show which of the two a remover does well. To separate the two, we propose recoverability-stratified evaluation, in which a point tracker run on the clean video labels each hole pixel by whether and how far away it is observed, so that fidelity and temporal stability can be reported per stratum against a copy reference. To reuse the observed content, we also propose evidence-guided sampling (EGS), which blends tracked colors into the clean-latent prediction of a video diffusion remover without training. On DAVIS, the perceptual advantage of three diffusion removers over flow propagation shrinks where the content is visible a few frames away (LPIPS difference-in-differences +0.046 to +0.056 against E2FGVI-HQ), and real paired captures show the same pattern for two of them. Their DAVIS hole warping error is two to four times that of ProPainter, and copying along clean-video tracks lowers their recoverable LPIPS by a quarter to two fifths. EGS closes 43% and 56% of the gap to this copy reference on held-out DAVIS when its colors come from clean-video tracks. With colors tracked on the masked input, a pre-registered confirmation finds no gain on MiniMax-Remover and a loss on ROSE. Diffusion removers thus leave observed content unused on DAVIS, and training-free reuse does not yet hold with tracked evidence.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗