跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.01614 · v1

Sonny-ENS: demystifying machine-learning ensemble weather forecasting

首次提交 2026-11-01 14:04
版本更新 2026-11-01 14:04
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:43
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Every weather forecast is uncertain, and decisions from flood warnings to energy trading depend on how well that uncertainty is quantified. Machine-learning (ML) ensembles now quantify it better than the best physics-based ensemble, yet two things about them remain opaque: whether their skill requires hundreds to thousands of accelerator-days of training, and how a network with a simple source of randomness produces a spread that follows the flow. Here we introduce Sonny-ENS, an ensemble of three 68.9-million-parameter networks with Monte Carlo dropout, trained on the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) in 2.7 A40 GPU-days. On 2022, it has a lower CRPS than the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts ensemble (ENS) on 96% of 570 targets and an 8.3% lower mean CRPS at lead times of 1-10 days. It outperforms the operational GenCast on 69% of the targets, and a 51-member, 15-day forecast takes 69 s on one GPU. Ablations identify the ingredients of this skill, and a Kolmogorov-Arnold sparse autoencoder shows that dropout injects uncertainty mainly in the tropics, whereas the spread grows where the atmosphere is baroclinically unstable (spatial correlation 0.91 with the Eady growth rate). Skillful probabilistic weather forecasts are therefore within reach of a single GPU server.

作者备注:25 pages, 6 figures, 7 Extended Data figures and 3 Extended Data tables; Supplementary Information (4 figures, 2 tables) included

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-01 14:04 · 最新观测版本

Sonny-ENS: demystifying machine-learning ensemble weather forecasting

Every weather forecast is uncertain, and decisions from flood warnings to energy trading depend on how well that uncertainty is quantified. Machine-learning (ML) ensembles now quantify it better than the best physics-based ensemble, yet two things about them remain opaque: whether their skill requires hundreds to thousands of accelerator-days of training, and how a network with a simple source of randomness produces a spread that follows the flow. Here we introduce Sonny-ENS, an ensemble of three 68.9-million-parameter networks with Monte Carlo dropout, trained on the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) in 2.7 A40 GPU-days. On 2022, it has a lower CRPS than the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts ensemble (ENS) on 96% of 570 targets and an 8.3% lower mean CRPS at lead times of 1-10 days. It outperforms the operational GenCast on 69% of the targets, and a 51-member, 15-day forecast takes 69 s on one GPU. Ablations identify the ingredients of this skill, and a Kolmogorov-Arnold sparse autoencoder shows that dropout injects uncertainty mainly in the tropics, whereas the spread grows where the atmosphere is baroclinically unstable (spatial correlation 0.91 with the Eady growth rate). Skillful probabilistic weather forecasts are therefore within reach of a single GPU server.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗