跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.01751 · v1

A Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for Real-Time Electric Vehicle Charging Management in IoEV-Enabled Smart Cities

首次提交 2026-11-01 17:57
版本更新 2026-11-01 17:57
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:43
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

The rapid growth of electric vehicles (EVs) in urban environments demands intelligent, decentralised charging management strategies that operate under strict real-time constraints. This paper proposes an Edge-Intelligent architecture in which each EV selects a charging station (CS) by querying a shared, centrally trained Deep Q-Network (DQN) policy over a lightweight MQTT publish-subscribe backbone; independent per-EV edge inference is the deployment target, not the configuration evaluated here. The reported simulation evaluates that shared DQN policy applied sequentially to each vehicle's observations within a single SUMO run, using MQTT for KPI telemetry while observations are obtained through TraCI. The system is evaluated on two real-world road networks from OpenStreetMap (Rabat Agdal-Hay Riad and Tangier, Morocco); the primary network carries four geolocated public charging stations with heterogeneous power levels (50 kW and 150 kW). Three traffic demand profiles (morning, midday, evening peak) are simulated, and four decision policies are compared: an Adaptive Heuristic, a Tabular Q-Learning agent, the proposed DQN agent, and a Double DQN variant. A multi-seed statistical protocol (7 seeds, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Cohen's d) evaluates the results. The DQN agent achieves a 6.8% relative improvement in charge rate and a 5.4% increase in delivered energy over the Adaptive Heuristic under Evening Peak demand ($p = 0.016$, Cohen's $d = 0.99$ and $1.51$), while showing no advantage in waiting time; on the second network the heuristic leads on waiting time, so the ranking is not stable across geographies. A scalability analysis shows linear state-space growth with station count and sub-millisecond inference; all runs include intermittent station outages under a Markov failure process.

作者备注:17 pages, 4 figures. Authors' accepted manuscript (paper ID 733916, AI2SD 2026 cycle), to appear in an indexed Springer Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems volume. Earlier preprint version deposited on Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22208979

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-01 17:57 · 最新观测版本

A Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for Real-Time Electric Vehicle Charging Management in IoEV-Enabled Smart Cities

The rapid growth of electric vehicles (EVs) in urban environments demands intelligent, decentralised charging management strategies that operate under strict real-time constraints. This paper proposes an Edge-Intelligent architecture in which each EV selects a charging station (CS) by querying a shared, centrally trained Deep Q-Network (DQN) policy over a lightweight MQTT publish-subscribe backbone; independent per-EV edge inference is the deployment target, not the configuration evaluated here. The reported simulation evaluates that shared DQN policy applied sequentially to each vehicle's observations within a single SUMO run, using MQTT for KPI telemetry while observations are obtained through TraCI. The system is evaluated on two real-world road networks from OpenStreetMap (Rabat Agdal-Hay Riad and Tangier, Morocco); the primary network carries four geolocated public charging stations with heterogeneous power levels (50 kW and 150 kW). Three traffic demand profiles (morning, midday, evening peak) are simulated, and four decision policies are compared: an Adaptive Heuristic, a Tabular Q-Learning agent, the proposed DQN agent, and a Double DQN variant. A multi-seed statistical protocol (7 seeds, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Cohen's d) evaluates the results. The DQN agent achieves a 6.8% relative improvement in charge rate and a 5.4% increase in delivered energy over the Adaptive Heuristic under Evening Peak demand ($p = 0.016$, Cohen's $d = 0.99$ and $1.51$), while showing no advantage in waiting time; on the second network the heuristic leads on waiting time, so the ranking is not stable across geographies. A scalability analysis shows linear state-space growth with station count and sub-millisecond inference; all runs include intermittent station outages under a Markov failure process.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗