跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.01945 · v1

Tracing How Language Models Integrate Temporal Anchors into Factual Recall

首次提交 2026-11-01 22:26
版本更新 2026-11-01 22:26
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:43
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Factual recall in language models is typically framed as retrieving a factual association: a subject--relation pair maps to a single object. However, many facts are context-dependent: the same pair maps to different objects depending on a condition such as time. We introduce anchored factual recall, in which the model receives an explicit conditioning expression, an anchor, and must select the object valid under it. This raises questions that single-object recall does not: where the anchor enters the computation, what it changes, and how that change selects the answer. Focusing on temporal anchors, we answer them with causal interventions on four open-weight models on English prompts and identify two routes. In a subject-mediated route, the anchor resolves the final subject-token representation to the queried year, and the relation redistributes the readout of this state across attention heads. In a direct route] the final position attends to the anchor, and upper-layer MLPs turn this signal into a preference for the time-appropriate object. The two routes are parallel channels: their contributions add up, most queries use both, and their balance depends on the query, e.g., on the relation, consistently across models. This reframes mechanistic accounts of factual recall from retrieving a single stored object to selecting among context-dependent alternatives.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-01 22:26 · 最新观测版本

Tracing How Language Models Integrate Temporal Anchors into Factual Recall

Factual recall in language models is typically framed as retrieving a factual association: a subject--relation pair maps to a single object. However, many facts are context-dependent: the same pair maps to different objects depending on a condition such as time. We introduce anchored factual recall, in which the model receives an explicit conditioning expression, an anchor, and must select the object valid under it. This raises questions that single-object recall does not: where the anchor enters the computation, what it changes, and how that change selects the answer. Focusing on temporal anchors, we answer them with causal interventions on four open-weight models on English prompts and identify two routes. In a subject-mediated route, the anchor resolves the final subject-token representation to the queried year, and the relation redistributes the readout of this state across attention heads. In a direct route] the final position attends to the anchor, and upper-layer MLPs turn this signal into a preference for the time-appropriate object. The two routes are parallel channels: their contributions add up, most queries use both, and their balance depends on the query, e.g., on the relation, consistently across models. This reframes mechanistic accounts of factual recall from retrieving a single stored object to selecting among context-dependent alternatives.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗