跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.01973 · v1

Supporting Orthographic Recall of Chinese Characters through Self-Generated Compositional Mnemonic Stories: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study

首次提交 2026-11-01 23:11
版本更新 2026-11-01 23:11
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:43
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Mnemonic studies on Chinese characters have mostly tested provided mnemonics against writing outcomes and self-generated mnemonics against meaning recall; whether writing one's own component-based story helps learners write the character has received little attention. I present Nuome, a tool that shows a character's component decomposition next to an editor in which learners write their own story, with live checks on whether the story covers every component and the character's meaning. In a within-subjects pilot, eight L2 learners each learned four self-chosen characters with the story builder and four with a read-only panel showing the same decomposition, with identical writing practice. Descriptively, partial-credit written-recall scores favoured the story builder by 18.8 percentage points immediately (N = 8) and 17.9 points after two days (N = 7); mean study time per character was 1.69 times as long (n = 6); usability was high (SUS 88.1). Interviews yielded three themes: participants felt that composing a story made them attend to components; knowing the components is not the same as being able to write them; and characters differ in how well they suit a story.

作者备注:TCLT13: The 13th International Conference and Workshops on Technology and Chinese Language Teaching, Oct 2026, The University of Hong Kong

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-01 23:11 · 最新观测版本

Supporting Orthographic Recall of Chinese Characters through Self-Generated Compositional Mnemonic Stories: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study

Mnemonic studies on Chinese characters have mostly tested provided mnemonics against writing outcomes and self-generated mnemonics against meaning recall; whether writing one's own component-based story helps learners write the character has received little attention. I present Nuome, a tool that shows a character's component decomposition next to an editor in which learners write their own story, with live checks on whether the story covers every component and the character's meaning. In a within-subjects pilot, eight L2 learners each learned four self-chosen characters with the story builder and four with a read-only panel showing the same decomposition, with identical writing practice. Descriptively, partial-credit written-recall scores favoured the story builder by 18.8 percentage points immediately (N = 8) and 17.9 points after two days (N = 7); mean study time per character was 1.69 times as long (n = 6); usability was high (SUS 88.1). Interviews yielded three themes: participants felt that composing a story made them attend to components; knowing the components is not the same as being able to write them; and characters differ in how well they suit a story.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗