跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.02506 · v1

CellPlex: Benchmarking Single-Cell Spatial Proteomics Prediction from H&E

首次提交 2026-11-02 12:28
版本更新 2026-11-02 12:28
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:42
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Spatial proteomics measures tens of proteins in every cell of a tissue section, but its cost confines it to small research cohorts, whereas hematoxylin and eosin (H\&E) slides exist for nearly every patient. Inferring single-cell spatial proteomics from H\&E would bring its analyses to routine pathology, and a growing number of virtual staining models pursue this goal. Each is evaluated on its own cohort, panel and pixel-level metric, and released models transfer poorly to new cohorts, leaving open which approach to build on and which proteins H\&E can reveal. We introduce CellPlex, a benchmark that poses the task at the level of the cell: seven cohorts with same-section H\&E and multiplexed immunofluorescence, from colorectal and breast cancer to lymph-node metastases, bone marrow and glioma, with 717 samples, 44.8 million cells and 149 proteins, processed by one pipeline into per-cell targets. Pathology foundation models (PFMs) are adapted with one cell-level protocol, specialist models are fine-tuned under a matched budget, and all are scored on the same cells. Adapted PFMs are the most accurate models on every cohort, ahead of the specialists even after fine-tuning, but keep less than half of their accuracy on cohorts they were not trained on. Which proteins can be predicted depends on the tissue, not on how many cells were measured for them. By fixing the cells, targets and splits on which predictions are judged, CellPlex sets a common standard for inferring costly molecular measurements from routine H\&E and shows how far H\&E can stand in for spatial proteomics. We will release the data, splits, evaluation code and baselines as a testbed for developing and comparing future pathology foundation models and virtual staining methods.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-02 12:28 · 最新观测版本

CellPlex: Benchmarking Single-Cell Spatial Proteomics Prediction from H&E

Spatial proteomics measures tens of proteins in every cell of a tissue section, but its cost confines it to small research cohorts, whereas hematoxylin and eosin (H\&E) slides exist for nearly every patient. Inferring single-cell spatial proteomics from H\&E would bring its analyses to routine pathology, and a growing number of virtual staining models pursue this goal. Each is evaluated on its own cohort, panel and pixel-level metric, and released models transfer poorly to new cohorts, leaving open which approach to build on and which proteins H\&E can reveal. We introduce CellPlex, a benchmark that poses the task at the level of the cell: seven cohorts with same-section H\&E and multiplexed immunofluorescence, from colorectal and breast cancer to lymph-node metastases, bone marrow and glioma, with 717 samples, 44.8 million cells and 149 proteins, processed by one pipeline into per-cell targets. Pathology foundation models (PFMs) are adapted with one cell-level protocol, specialist models are fine-tuned under a matched budget, and all are scored on the same cells. Adapted PFMs are the most accurate models on every cohort, ahead of the specialists even after fine-tuning, but keep less than half of their accuracy on cohorts they were not trained on. Which proteins can be predicted depends on the tissue, not on how many cells were measured for them. By fixing the cells, targets and splits on which predictions are judged, CellPlex sets a common standard for inferring costly molecular measurements from routine H\&E and shows how far H\&E can stand in for spatial proteomics. We will release the data, splits, evaluation code and baselines as a testbed for developing and comparing future pathology foundation models and virtual staining methods.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗