跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.04102 · v1

Is This 3D Asset Usable? Beyond the Beauty Render for Asset Curation

首次提交 2026-11-03 08:24
版本更新 2026-11-03 08:24
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:40
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Large 3D repositories make it easy to collect assets, but difficult to determine whether they can be reused reliably across scene assembly, editing, rendering, game production, and training-data construction. An asset can look plausible in RGB while hiding disconnected geometry, problematic UV organization, or materials that fail to resolve correctly after import. We introduce Diagnostic Rendered Evidence (DRE): aligned beauty, wireframe, and UV-seam-plus-wireframe views scored by pass-specific frozen ViT classifiers and combined through late fusion. On 1,234 human labeled TexVerse assets, nested grouped evaluation achieves 86.36% balanced accuracy and 88.32% bad-asset recall. On a separate, balanced 764 external reference test, DRE achieved 88.9% balanced reference-label accuracy. Our method requires only an imported asset and renderer-derived evidence, without repository identity, creator, popularity, text, or source metadata at inference. Our results support cross-corpus portability and show that purpose built diagnostic views expose defects that just the beauty views can miss. Webpage: https://rbz-99.github.io/is-this-3d-asset-usable/

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-03 08:24 · 最新观测版本

Is This 3D Asset Usable? Beyond the Beauty Render for Asset Curation

Large 3D repositories make it easy to collect assets, but difficult to determine whether they can be reused reliably across scene assembly, editing, rendering, game production, and training-data construction. An asset can look plausible in RGB while hiding disconnected geometry, problematic UV organization, or materials that fail to resolve correctly after import. We introduce Diagnostic Rendered Evidence (DRE): aligned beauty, wireframe, and UV-seam-plus-wireframe views scored by pass-specific frozen ViT classifiers and combined through late fusion. On 1,234 human labeled TexVerse assets, nested grouped evaluation achieves 86.36% balanced accuracy and 88.32% bad-asset recall. On a separate, balanced 764 external reference test, DRE achieved 88.9% balanced reference-label accuracy. Our method requires only an imported asset and renderer-derived evidence, without repository identity, creator, popularity, text, or source metadata at inference. Our results support cross-corpus portability and show that purpose built diagnostic views expose defects that just the beauty views can miss. Webpage: https://rbz-99.github.io/is-this-3d-asset-usable/

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗