跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.04186 · v1

Incremental Open Addressing Has No Time-Space Tradeoff

首次提交 2026-11-03 10:22
版本更新 2026-11-03 10:22
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:40
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

In this paper, we show that there is no time-space tradeoff in incremental open addressing: there is an incremental open-addressed hash table that supports $O(1)$ worst-case expected time insertions, positive queries, and negative queries, at any load factor (even load factor $1$). As an intermediate result, we also revisit the problem of constructing an incremental open-addressed hash table that does not perform reordering (does not move elements around over time). In this setting, we show that it is possible to get $O(1)$ amortized expected positive query time together with $O(1)$ worst-case expected insertion time, a combination that was not previously known to be possible.

作者备注:46 pages, 4 figures, 1 table

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-03 10:22 · 最新观测版本

Incremental Open Addressing Has No Time-Space Tradeoff

In this paper, we show that there is no time-space tradeoff in incremental open addressing: there is an incremental open-addressed hash table that supports $O(1)$ worst-case expected time insertions, positive queries, and negative queries, at any load factor (even load factor $1$). As an intermediate result, we also revisit the problem of constructing an incremental open-addressed hash table that does not perform reordering (does not move elements around over time). In this setting, we show that it is possible to get $O(1)$ amortized expected positive query time together with $O(1)$ worst-case expected insertion time, a combination that was not previously known to be possible.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗