← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.04186 · v1
Incremental Open Addressing Has No Time-Space Tradeoff
首次提交 2026-11-03 10:22
版本更新 2026-11-03 10:22
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:40
摘要
In this paper, we show that there is no time-space tradeoff in incremental open addressing: there is an incremental open-addressed hash table that supports $O(1)$ worst-case expected time insertions, positive queries, and negative queries, at any load factor (even load factor $1$). As an intermediate result, we also revisit the problem of constructing an incremental open-addressed hash table that does not perform reordering (does not move elements around over time). In this setting, we show that it is possible to get $O(1)$ amortized expected positive query time together with $O(1)$ worst-case expected insertion time, a combination that was not previously known to be possible.
作者备注:46 pages, 4 figures, 1 table
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-03 10:22 · 最新观测版本
Incremental Open Addressing Has No Time-Space Tradeoff
In this paper, we show that there is no time-space tradeoff in incremental open addressing: there is an incremental open-addressed hash table that supports $O(1)$ worst-case expected time insertions, positive queries, and negative queries, at any load factor (even load factor $1$). As an intermediate result, we also revisit the problem of constructing an incremental open-addressed hash table that does not perform reordering (does not move elements around over time). In this setting, we show that it is possible to get $O(1)$ amortized expected positive query time together with $O(1)$ worst-case expected insertion time, a combination that was not previously known to be possible.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗