跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.04811 · v1

NightIQA: A Comprehensive Dataset and Benchmark for MLLM-Based Nighttime Image Quality Assessment

首次提交 2026-11-03 20:42
版本更新 2026-11-03 20:42
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:39
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Nighttime images are inherently susceptible to complex, compound degradations, making accurate quality assessment exceptionally challenging. Score-based IQA methods condense quality into a single number, lacking the multi-dimensional, language-grounded reasoning required for nighttime evaluation. Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) offer a more comprehensive alternative, yet remain constrained by a critical data gap: existing real-world IQA datasets are overwhelmingly daytime-centric and often built from outdated captures, while synthetic alternatives lack nighttime-specific degradation modeling, yielding artifacts far removed from authentic nighttime conditions. To bridge this gap, we present NightIQA, a dataset and benchmark suite purpose-built for MLLM-based nighttime IQA. It comprises three core components: NightIQA-Real, a real-world dataset of 1,769 high-resolution images that we captured ourselves with modern equipment, encompassing six canonical distortion types and structured multi-dimensional annotations; NightIQA-Bench, a benchmark of 1,078 visually grounded multiple-choice questions tailored to MLLM-based nighttime IQA, organized around a four-level evaluation hierarchy spanning Perception, Technical Assessment, Localization, and Reasoning; and NightIQA-Syn, an inherently scalable, scene-aware synthesis pipeline that jointly models global-level and instance-level degradations, with an initial release of 80k high-fidelity images alongside the full generation code. Fine-tuned on NightIQA with Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), Qwen3-VL-8B outperforms open-source IQA methods and achieves higher overall accuracy than leading closed-source models, highlighting the value of domain-specific data and structured supervision.

作者备注:Accepted to WACV 2027. 25 pages including supplementary material

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-03 20:42 · 最新观测版本

NightIQA: A Comprehensive Dataset and Benchmark for MLLM-Based Nighttime Image Quality Assessment

Nighttime images are inherently susceptible to complex, compound degradations, making accurate quality assessment exceptionally challenging. Score-based IQA methods condense quality into a single number, lacking the multi-dimensional, language-grounded reasoning required for nighttime evaluation. Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) offer a more comprehensive alternative, yet remain constrained by a critical data gap: existing real-world IQA datasets are overwhelmingly daytime-centric and often built from outdated captures, while synthetic alternatives lack nighttime-specific degradation modeling, yielding artifacts far removed from authentic nighttime conditions. To bridge this gap, we present NightIQA, a dataset and benchmark suite purpose-built for MLLM-based nighttime IQA. It comprises three core components: NightIQA-Real, a real-world dataset of 1,769 high-resolution images that we captured ourselves with modern equipment, encompassing six canonical distortion types and structured multi-dimensional annotations; NightIQA-Bench, a benchmark of 1,078 visually grounded multiple-choice questions tailored to MLLM-based nighttime IQA, organized around a four-level evaluation hierarchy spanning Perception, Technical Assessment, Localization, and Reasoning; and NightIQA-Syn, an inherently scalable, scene-aware synthesis pipeline that jointly models global-level and instance-level degradations, with an initial release of 80k high-fidelity images alongside the full generation code. Fine-tuned on NightIQA with Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), Qwen3-VL-8B outperforms open-source IQA methods and achieves higher overall accuracy than leading closed-source models, highlighting the value of domain-specific data and structured supervision.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗