跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.05004 · v2

ScoreDial: Precise Control of Visual Attributes in Image Generation via Regressor Guidance from Limited Human Ratings

首次提交 2026-11-03 22:53
版本更新 2026-11-05 10:58
雷达观测 2026-11-06 11:06
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Requested-value control is stricter than continuous steering: given $c$ on a human-rating scale, the generated image should attain that value from only limited ratings. We present ScoreDial, which fits a differentiable regressor $R$ to 100-479 human-rated images; once $R$ is fixed, a requested value $c$ is defined on its output scale, and learned target conditioning is paired with error-adaptive guidance that repeatedly reduces $|R(\mathbf{x})-c|$ during sampling. Across tire slip resistance, interior visual complexity, food desire-to-eat, and soap translucency, using one set of sampler settings, ScoreDial reaches requested values and achieves $R$-MAE at most 0.013 over a range of width 0.8 and Spearman $ρ=0.980$, the maximum attainable under our protocol. Because $R$ also drives sampling, we evaluate agreement with $R$ separately from matched sweeps, an independent auditor fitted to the same ratings on a backbone no deployed regressor uses, and blinded human judgments. MPGD-flow also reaches the requested values under $R$, but ScoreDial has larger auditor displacement on every attribute, the largest among all compared methods, and a stronger MPGD-flow setting gives up target agreement without closing this gap. On every attribute, removing target conditioning leaves low $R$-MAE but more than halves auditor displacement, separating precise score correction from attribute movement. Blinded rating studies with 15 raters per attribute show mean human ratings track $c$ on tire and soap, with linear $R^2=0.665$ and $R^2=0.786$, and in forced-choice comparisons of matched sweeps, raters chose ScoreDial's as the clearer progression in at least 84% of judgments against every baseline. Code: https://github.com/Kamijo-Gen/ScoreDial.

作者备注:Accepted to WACV 2027. 37 pages, 27 figures, 4 tables, including the supplementary material. v2: code link moved from the conclusion to the abstract; results unchanged

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

仅对比实际观测的元数据,不代表 PDF 正文或实验变化。版本可能不连续;带删除线为移除,下划线为新增。

摘要变化

Requested-value control is stricter than continuous steering: given $c$ on a human-rating scale, the generated image should attain that value from only limited ratings. We present ScoreDial, which fits a differentiable regressor $R$ to 100-479 human-rated images; once $R$ is fixed, a requested value $c$ is defined on its output scale, and learned target conditioning is paired with error-adaptive guidance that repeatedly reduces $|R(\mathbf{x})-c|$ during sampling. Across tire slip resistance, interior visual complexity, food desire-to-eat, and soap translucency, using one set of sampler settings shared across all four, ScoreDial reaches requested values and achieves, on all four attributes, $R$-MAE at most 0.013 over a range of width 0.8 and Spearman $ρ=0.980$, the maximum attainable under our evaluation protocol. Because $R$ also drives sampling, we evaluate agreement with $R$ separately from matched sweeps, an independent auditor fitted to the same ratings on a backbone none of theno deployed regressorsregressor uses, and blinded human judgments. MPGD-flow also reaches the requested values under $R$, but ScoreDial has larger auditor displacement on every attribute, the largest among all compared methods, and a stronger MPGD-flow setting gives up target agreement without closing this gap. On every attribute, removing target conditioning leaves low $R$-MAE but more than halves auditor displacement, separating precise score correction from attribute movement. Blinded rating studies with 15 raters per attribute show that mean human ratings track $c$ on tire and soap, with linear $R^2=0.665$ and $R^2=0.786$, and in forced-choice comparisons of matched sweeps, raters chose ScoreDial's as the clearer progression in at least 84% of judgments against every baseline. Code: https://github.com/Kamijo-Gen/ScoreDial.

作者备注变化

Accepted to WACV 2027. 37 pages, 27 figures, 4 tables, including the supplementary material. v2: code link moved from the conclusion to the abstract; results unchanged

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-05 10:58 · 最新观测版本

ScoreDial: Precise Control of Visual Attributes in Image Generation via Regressor Guidance from Limited Human Ratings

Requested-value control is stricter than continuous steering: given $c$ on a human-rating scale, the generated image should attain that value from only limited ratings. We present ScoreDial, which fits a differentiable regressor $R$ to 100-479 human-rated images; once $R$ is fixed, a requested value $c$ is defined on its output scale, and learned target conditioning is paired with error-adaptive guidance that repeatedly reduces $|R(\mathbf{x})-c|$ during sampling. Across tire slip resistance, interior visual complexity, food desire-to-eat, and soap translucency, using one set of sampler settings, ScoreDial reaches requested values and achieves $R$-MAE at most 0.013 over a range of width 0.8 and Spearman $ρ=0.980$, the maximum attainable under our protocol. Because $R$ also drives sampling, we evaluate agreement with $R$ separately from matched sweeps, an independent auditor fitted to the same ratings on a backbone no deployed regressor uses, and blinded human judgments. MPGD-flow also reaches the requested values under $R$, but ScoreDial has larger auditor displacement on every attribute, the largest among all compared methods, and a stronger MPGD-flow setting gives up target agreement without closing this gap. On every attribute, removing target conditioning leaves low $R$-MAE but more than halves auditor displacement, separating precise score correction from attribute movement. Blinded rating studies with 15 raters per attribute show mean human ratings track $c$ on tire and soap, with linear $R^2=0.665$ and $R^2=0.786$, and in forced-choice comparisons of matched sweeps, raters chose ScoreDial's as the clearer progression in at least 84% of judgments against every baseline. Code: https://github.com/Kamijo-Gen/ScoreDial.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗
v1 · 2026-11-03 22:53

ScoreDial: Precise Control of Visual Attributes in Image Generation via Regressor Guidance from Limited Human Ratings

Requested-value control is stricter than continuous steering: given $c$ on a human-rating scale, the generated image should attain that value from only limited ratings. We present ScoreDial, which fits a differentiable regressor $R$ to 100-479 human-rated images; once $R$ is fixed, a requested value $c$ is defined on its output scale, and learned target conditioning is paired with error-adaptive guidance that repeatedly reduces $|R(\mathbf{x})-c|$ during sampling. Across tire slip resistance, interior visual complexity, food desire-to-eat, and soap translucency, using one set of sampler settings shared across all four, ScoreDial reaches requested values and achieves, on all four attributes, $R$-MAE at most 0.013 over a range of width 0.8 and Spearman $ρ=0.980$, the maximum attainable under our evaluation protocol. Because $R$ also drives sampling, we evaluate agreement with $R$ separately from matched sweeps, an independent auditor fitted to the same ratings on a backbone none of the deployed regressors uses, and blinded human judgments. MPGD-flow also reaches the requested values under $R$, but ScoreDial has larger auditor displacement on every attribute, the largest among all compared methods, and a stronger MPGD-flow setting gives up target agreement without closing this gap. On every attribute, removing target conditioning leaves low $R$-MAE but more than halves auditor displacement, separating precise score correction from attribute movement. Blinded rating studies with 15 raters per attribute show that mean human ratings track $c$ on tire and soap, with linear $R^2=0.665$ and $R^2=0.786$, and in forced-choice comparisons of matched sweeps, raters chose ScoreDial's as the clearer progression in at least 84% of judgments against every baseline.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗