跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.05667 · v1

Correct Robots Before They Make Mistakes: Proactive Human-in-the-Loop Intervention via Preference Learning

首次提交 2026-11-04 05:54
版本更新 2026-11-04 05:54
雷达观测 2026-11-05 10:08
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

This paper presents Proactive Human-in-the-Loop (PHIL), a framework for proactive policy correction and preference-based post-training. PHIL enables operators to preview policy-predicted future motion and intervene before anticipated undesirable actions. During takeover, PHIL continues querying the policy and displaying its predicted trajectories in the physical workspace through an extended reality (XR) interface. PHIL pairs rejected policy predictions with corrective action chunks subsequently executed from the same physical state over the same horizon, and preference-based post-training encourages the policy to favor these corrections. This paper evaluates PHIL on four real-world manipulation tasks using a diffusion policy and a pretrained vision-language-action policy. With five correction episodes per condition, PHIL increases mean success rates across the evaluated tasks and demonstration budgets from 44.0% to 70.3% for the diffusion policy and from 57.8% to 76.9% for X-VLA, compared with HG-DAgger. Separately, policies trained with proactive corrections show fewer unnecessary recovery behaviors in successful episodes. Project page: https://intuitive-robots.github.io/PHIL-page/.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-04 05:54 · 最新观测版本

Correct Robots Before They Make Mistakes: Proactive Human-in-the-Loop Intervention via Preference Learning

This paper presents Proactive Human-in-the-Loop (PHIL), a framework for proactive policy correction and preference-based post-training. PHIL enables operators to preview policy-predicted future motion and intervene before anticipated undesirable actions. During takeover, PHIL continues querying the policy and displaying its predicted trajectories in the physical workspace through an extended reality (XR) interface. PHIL pairs rejected policy predictions with corrective action chunks subsequently executed from the same physical state over the same horizon, and preference-based post-training encourages the policy to favor these corrections. This paper evaluates PHIL on four real-world manipulation tasks using a diffusion policy and a pretrained vision-language-action policy. With five correction episodes per condition, PHIL increases mean success rates across the evaluated tasks and demonstration budgets from 44.0% to 70.3% for the diffusion policy and from 57.8% to 76.9% for X-VLA, compared with HG-DAgger. Separately, policies trained with proactive corrections show fewer unnecessary recovery behaviors in successful episodes. Project page: https://intuitive-robots.github.io/PHIL-page/.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗