跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.05871 · v1

The Invocation Bottleneck in LLM-Based Lossless Compression: What Can Be Removed and What Must Be Traded

首次提交 2026-11-04 11:04
版本更新 2026-11-04 11:04
雷达观测 2026-11-05 10:08
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Large language models (LLMs) compress text far better than classical compressors, but LLM-based compressors are slow, particularly during decompression. We argue that their decoding time has two fundamentally different sources. Execution redundancy, such as per-token host transfers, CPU-side coding, and token-by-token encoding, is work that the coded output does not require and can be removed without changing a single output bit. Sequential dependency, one model call per decoded token, is inherent to lossless decoding and cannot be removed by better execution, only traded for more calls or for more bits. We remove execution redundancy with a GPU-resident pipeline whose block-parallel encoding is made lossless in half precision by batch-invariant kernels, speeding up arithmetic coding by up to 5.8x in encoding and 3.0x in decoding without changing its compression rate. We then study the two ways of trading sequential dependency, speculative dual-model coding (SDMC) and multi-token single-model coding (MSMC), characterize the compression cost of predicting several tokens from a shared prefix, and identify the workloads in which fewer model calls are worth that cost.

作者备注:14 pages, 7 figures, 4 tables. Code: https://github.com/Angie-Yan/LLM-based-Data-Compression

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-04 11:04 · 最新观测版本

The Invocation Bottleneck in LLM-Based Lossless Compression: What Can Be Removed and What Must Be Traded

Large language models (LLMs) compress text far better than classical compressors, but LLM-based compressors are slow, particularly during decompression. We argue that their decoding time has two fundamentally different sources. Execution redundancy, such as per-token host transfers, CPU-side coding, and token-by-token encoding, is work that the coded output does not require and can be removed without changing a single output bit. Sequential dependency, one model call per decoded token, is inherent to lossless decoding and cannot be removed by better execution, only traded for more calls or for more bits. We remove execution redundancy with a GPU-resident pipeline whose block-parallel encoding is made lossless in half precision by batch-invariant kernels, speeding up arithmetic coding by up to 5.8x in encoding and 3.0x in decoding without changing its compression rate. We then study the two ways of trading sequential dependency, speculative dual-model coding (SDMC) and multi-token single-model coding (MSMC), characterize the compression cost of predicting several tokens from a shared prefix, and identify the workloads in which fewer model calls are worth that cost.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗