跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.06184 · v1

Can Astra Solve RoboMME without Breaking the Bank?

首次提交 2026-11-04 17:01
版本更新 2026-11-04 17:01
雷达观测 2026-11-05 11:10
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Robotic manipulation often requires remembering information that is no longer visible, such as an object's location before occlusion or the order of a demonstrated action sequence. A large vision-language planner can read this history, but calling it before every action chunk is slow and costly. We present a three-tier system for the RoboMME benchmark. GPT-6 Astra (System 2) selects a grounded subtask from stored visual history, a $π_{0.5}$ vision-language-action policy (System 1) executes it, and a fine-tuned Qwen3-VL-4B monitor (System 1.5) checks after each action chunk whether the subtask is finished. The instruction is kept until the monitor reports completion or a task-specific event occurs, while the policy keeps acting on new observations. On RoboMME, the system succeeds in 79.13% of episodes with an average of 3.63 Astra calls and 80.84 seconds per episode. This is 34.62 points above the best published non-oracle baseline and 4.95 points below GroundSG+Oracle, which gives the low-level policy ground-truth subgoals.

作者备注:Accepted at the Workshop on Memory for Robot Foundation Models and the Workshop on Agentic Robotics, CoRL 2026. Project page: https://bingaochen.github.io/Astra-on-RoboMME/

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-04 17:01 · 最新观测版本

Can Astra Solve RoboMME without Breaking the Bank?

Robotic manipulation often requires remembering information that is no longer visible, such as an object's location before occlusion or the order of a demonstrated action sequence. A large vision-language planner can read this history, but calling it before every action chunk is slow and costly. We present a three-tier system for the RoboMME benchmark. GPT-6 Astra (System 2) selects a grounded subtask from stored visual history, a $π_{0.5}$ vision-language-action policy (System 1) executes it, and a fine-tuned Qwen3-VL-4B monitor (System 1.5) checks after each action chunk whether the subtask is finished. The instruction is kept until the monitor reports completion or a task-specific event occurs, while the policy keeps acting on new observations. On RoboMME, the system succeeds in 79.13% of episodes with an average of 3.63 Astra calls and 80.84 seconds per episode. This is 34.62 points above the best published non-oracle baseline and 4.95 points below GroundSG+Oracle, which gives the low-level policy ground-truth subgoals.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗