跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.06221 · v1

FedXCrop: Privacy-Preserving Crop Disease Detection via Federated Learning with Post-Aggregation Explainability under Non-IID Farm Distributions

首次提交 2026-11-04 17:30
版本更新 2026-11-04 17:30
雷达观测 2026-11-05 11:10
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Deep learning can classify crop diseases accurately from benchmark leaf images, but centralized training requires farms to share raw data, and predictions without explanations offer limited support for treatment decisions. We present FedXCrop, a federated crop disease classification pipeline that quantitatively evaluates explanations of the aggregated global model. A MobileNetV2 model trained centrally on PlantVillage achieved 99.38% test accuracy (standard deviation 0.05 over three seeds) on a fixed test set of 5,428 images across 38 classes. Federated models initialized with ImageNet weights were trained for 30 rounds across five clients. FedAvg achieved 98.81% accuracy with identically distributed clients and 98.81%, 98.59%, and 97.78% under Dirichlet label skew (alpha = 1, 0.5, and 0.1, respectively). FedProx was not significantly different from FedAvg at any heterogeneity level (McNemar p > 0.3). Grad-CAM and SmoothGrad explanations were evaluated on 380 test images. Both attributed more energy to the leaf than chance (0.70-0.78 versus 0.60), while Grad-CAM maps from federated and centralized models showed Spearman correlations of 0.74-0.76. Agreement decreased as heterogeneity increased, lesion localization was only modestly above chance, and a model-randomization test indicated that SmoothGrad maps depended substantially on image structure rather than learned parameters. In this setting, label skew reduced federated accuracy by 0.6-1.6 percentage points relative to centralized training. FedAvg largely preserved Grad-CAM behavior, while FedProx provided no measurable benefit.

作者备注:26 pages. Includes 38-class crop disease classification experiments, federated learning evaluation under non-IID client distributions, and quantitative explainability analysis using Grad-CAM and SmoothGrad. Code and experimental results: https://github.com/Kriti2709/fedxcrp

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-04 17:30 · 最新观测版本

FedXCrop: Privacy-Preserving Crop Disease Detection via Federated Learning with Post-Aggregation Explainability under Non-IID Farm Distributions

Deep learning can classify crop diseases accurately from benchmark leaf images, but centralized training requires farms to share raw data, and predictions without explanations offer limited support for treatment decisions. We present FedXCrop, a federated crop disease classification pipeline that quantitatively evaluates explanations of the aggregated global model. A MobileNetV2 model trained centrally on PlantVillage achieved 99.38% test accuracy (standard deviation 0.05 over three seeds) on a fixed test set of 5,428 images across 38 classes. Federated models initialized with ImageNet weights were trained for 30 rounds across five clients. FedAvg achieved 98.81% accuracy with identically distributed clients and 98.81%, 98.59%, and 97.78% under Dirichlet label skew (alpha = 1, 0.5, and 0.1, respectively). FedProx was not significantly different from FedAvg at any heterogeneity level (McNemar p > 0.3). Grad-CAM and SmoothGrad explanations were evaluated on 380 test images. Both attributed more energy to the leaf than chance (0.70-0.78 versus 0.60), while Grad-CAM maps from federated and centralized models showed Spearman correlations of 0.74-0.76. Agreement decreased as heterogeneity increased, lesion localization was only modestly above chance, and a model-randomization test indicated that SmoothGrad maps depended substantially on image structure rather than learned parameters. In this setting, label skew reduced federated accuracy by 0.6-1.6 percentage points relative to centralized training. FedAvg largely preserved Grad-CAM behavior, while FedProx provided no measurable benefit.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗