← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.06226 · v1
Understanding the Perception of Transliterated Offensive Social Media Posts Among Banglish and Hinglish Users
首次提交 2026-11-04 17:35
版本更新 2026-11-04 17:35
雷达观测 2026-11-05 11:10
摘要
Effective content moderation depends on understanding not just what harmful content looks like, but how users perceive and respond to it. When offensive language is written in transliterated forms such as Banglish or Hinglish (Bangla or Hindi in Latin script), it may be interpreted very differently than in native scripts, with direct consequences for whether users report, ignore, or recognize it as harmful. Yet little is known about how script choice relates to user perception, or how these perceptions vary across demographic groups. To investigate these perceptions, we conducted a user study with $310$ participants ($193$ Hindi, $60$ Bangla, $57$ Bangla-Hindi bilingual speakers) who evaluated offensive posts in native scripts and transliterations. Participants provided offensiveness scores ($4.03$ for Banglish, $3.86$ for Hinglish) to transliterated posts, yet reporting fell from $20.9\%$ (native - Bangla, Hindi) to $18.2\%$ (transliterated - Banglish, Hinglish). Ignoring remained the dominant response (range $25.38\%-44\%$ overall). Women reported at higher probability than men for native-script ($23.6\%$ vs. $17.7\%$) and showed almost identical reporting probability in comparison to men for transliterated posts ($17.5\%$ vs. $17.9\%$), and younger participants ($<40$) rated Banglish content as more offensive than older participants ($\geq 40$), (Overall offensive score: $3.99$ vs. $3.78$). These findings identify transliteration as critical blind spot for moderation, underscoring the need for linguistically sensitive approaches to online safety.
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-04 17:35 · 最新观测版本
Understanding the Perception of Transliterated Offensive Social Media Posts Among Banglish and Hinglish Users
Effective content moderation depends on understanding not just what harmful content looks like, but how users perceive and respond to it. When offensive language is written in transliterated forms such as Banglish or Hinglish (Bangla or Hindi in Latin script), it may be interpreted very differently than in native scripts, with direct consequences for whether users report, ignore, or recognize it as harmful. Yet little is known about how script choice relates to user perception, or how these perceptions vary across demographic groups. To investigate these perceptions, we conducted a user study with $310$ participants ($193$ Hindi, $60$ Bangla, $57$ Bangla-Hindi bilingual speakers) who evaluated offensive posts in native scripts and transliterations. Participants provided offensiveness scores ($4.03$ for Banglish, $3.86$ for Hinglish) to transliterated posts, yet reporting fell from $20.9\%$ (native - Bangla, Hindi) to $18.2\%$ (transliterated - Banglish, Hinglish). Ignoring remained the dominant response (range $25.38\%-44\%$ overall). Women reported at higher probability than men for native-script ($23.6\%$ vs. $17.7\%$) and showed almost identical reporting probability in comparison to men for transliterated posts ($17.5\%$ vs. $17.9\%$), and younger participants ($<40$) rated Banglish content as more offensive than older participants ($\geq 40$), (Overall offensive score: $3.99$ vs. $3.78$). These findings identify transliteration as critical blind spot for moderation, underscoring the need for linguistically sensitive approaches to online safety.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗