跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.07498 · v1

Degree-Equalized View-Graph Selection under Tight Pair Budgets

首次提交 2026-11-05 14:01
版本更新 2026-11-05 14:01
雷达观测 2026-11-06 12:09
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Fully matching all image pairs in Structure-from-Motion is quadratic in the number of images, so practical pipelines pass a budgeted subset to the final matching and reconstruction backend. One-shot selectors score candidates with image retrieval, cheap geometric probes, or a learned prior and finalize B pairs before full matching. Their priorities do not account for the degree already allocated to each image, which can concentrate edges on a few images. Across nine large 1DSfM internet photo collections at B=2N, the coverage top-B selector leaves 54% of covered images with realized degree at most two. Reconstruction can then fail even when the selected graph is nearly connected and almost fully verified. Our training-free greedy rule, Degree-Equalized Allocation (DEAL), exponentially downweights pairs whose endpoints are already well covered. On these collections, DEAL improves the one-shot selector built on the same prior (from 0.776 to 0.929) and matches the mean registered-image ratio of an SfM-supervised edge prior under the shared backend (0.929 vs 0.930), without training. On the largely saturated 38-scene standard benchmark suite, DEAL gives the highest mean among the evaluated training-free selectors (0.875 vs 0.858 one-shot).

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-05 14:01 · 最新观测版本

Degree-Equalized View-Graph Selection under Tight Pair Budgets

Fully matching all image pairs in Structure-from-Motion is quadratic in the number of images, so practical pipelines pass a budgeted subset to the final matching and reconstruction backend. One-shot selectors score candidates with image retrieval, cheap geometric probes, or a learned prior and finalize B pairs before full matching. Their priorities do not account for the degree already allocated to each image, which can concentrate edges on a few images. Across nine large 1DSfM internet photo collections at B=2N, the coverage top-B selector leaves 54% of covered images with realized degree at most two. Reconstruction can then fail even when the selected graph is nearly connected and almost fully verified. Our training-free greedy rule, Degree-Equalized Allocation (DEAL), exponentially downweights pairs whose endpoints are already well covered. On these collections, DEAL improves the one-shot selector built on the same prior (from 0.776 to 0.929) and matches the mean registered-image ratio of an SfM-supervised edge prior under the shared backend (0.929 vs 0.930), without training. On the largely saturated 38-scene standard benchmark suite, DEAL gives the highest mean among the evaluated training-free selectors (0.875 vs 0.858 one-shot).

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗