← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.07502 · v1
Coverage Hides Churn: Auditing and Preserving Conformal Decisions as VLM Label Registries Grow
首次提交 2026-11-05 14:06
版本更新 2026-11-05 14:06
雷达观测 2026-11-06 12:09
摘要
Vision-language classifiers can learn new labels from text alone, so the label lists they serve keep growing. We show that this growth silently changes conformal decisions about old labels. Common softmax-based conformal scores compare each label with an average over all labels; adding labels changes that average, and with it the score of every old label, even when the model, the image, and the old calibration data stay the same. Recalibrating after the update keeps the coverage guarantee, yet across eleven settings it changes at least one old decision on 53-90% of new images. Coverage cannot reveal this, because it checks only the true label: in five controlled settings that keep the old calibration, so that only the normalizer changes, old-class coverage moves by at most 0.01 while 60-67% of images change. We propose a lifecycle audit that measures these changes alongside coverage and set size, and a simple fix, PrefixCP: each class keeps the label registry that existed when it was added. Its old decisions then never change, each class keeps exact class-conditional coverage under exchangeability, and one prefix scan computes all historical normalizers at once. PrefixCP recovers 40.9-58.5% of the set-size gap between never updating the reference and recalibrating, which gives smaller sets but changes old decisions.
作者备注：Accepted at WACV 2027. Includes supplementary material
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-05 14:06 · 最新观测版本
Coverage Hides Churn: Auditing and Preserving Conformal Decisions as VLM Label Registries Grow
Vision-language classifiers can learn new labels from text alone, so the label lists they serve keep growing. We show that this growth silently changes conformal decisions about old labels. Common softmax-based conformal scores compare each label with an average over all labels; adding labels changes that average, and with it the score of every old label, even when the model, the image, and the old calibration data stay the same. Recalibrating after the update keeps the coverage guarantee, yet across eleven settings it changes at least one old decision on 53-90% of new images. Coverage cannot reveal this, because it checks only the true label: in five controlled settings that keep the old calibration, so that only the normalizer changes, old-class coverage moves by at most 0.01 while 60-67% of images change. We propose a lifecycle audit that measures these changes alongside coverage and set size, and a simple fix, PrefixCP: each class keeps the label registry that existed when it was added. Its old decisions then never change, each class keeps exact class-conditional coverage under exchangeability, and one prefix scan computes all historical normalizers at once. PrefixCP recovers 40.9-58.5% of the set-size gap between never updating the reference and recalibrating, which gives smaller sets but changes old decisions.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗