← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.07540 · v1
Action-Conditioned VLM Monitoring for Autonomous Vehicle Semantic Anomalies
首次提交 2026-11-05 14:48
版本更新 2026-11-05 14:48
雷达观测 2026-11-06 11:06
摘要
We study action-conditioned monitoring of autonomous-vehicle behavior in semantically unusual driving scenes. The target is whether the executed ego action is appropriate for the scene: the same scene can admit both normal and anomalous behavior, so visual unusualness alone does not determine the monitoring label. A Vision-Language Model (VLM) first predicts the scene-required action from an outcome-hidden video window; the monitor then compares that expectation with the realized ego-motion trajectory under an explicit compatibility rule. To study this monitoring task, we contribute a six-field taxonomy of 112 paired scenarios spanning both failure polarities (42 derived from documented incidents), a generated video corpus with estimated trajectories, and an exploratory two-stage monitor on that corpus. On 235 clips from 15 scenario families, the two-stage protocol with a fixed T-2.5 s window obtains 83.0% accuracy and anomaly recall 0.773, versus 74.5% and 0.536 for a single-stage video-only baseline; specificity is 0.880 versus 0.928.
作者备注：7 pages. Submitted to IEEE ICRA 2027
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-05 14:48 · 最新观测版本
Action-Conditioned VLM Monitoring for Autonomous Vehicle Semantic Anomalies
We study action-conditioned monitoring of autonomous-vehicle behavior in semantically unusual driving scenes. The target is whether the executed ego action is appropriate for the scene: the same scene can admit both normal and anomalous behavior, so visual unusualness alone does not determine the monitoring label. A Vision-Language Model (VLM) first predicts the scene-required action from an outcome-hidden video window; the monitor then compares that expectation with the realized ego-motion trajectory under an explicit compatibility rule. To study this monitoring task, we contribute a six-field taxonomy of 112 paired scenarios spanning both failure polarities (42 derived from documented incidents), a generated video corpus with estimated trajectories, and an exploratory two-stage monitor on that corpus. On 235 clips from 15 scenario families, the two-stage protocol with a fixed T-2.5 s window obtains 83.0% accuracy and anomaly recall 0.773, versus 74.5% and 0.536 for a single-stage video-only baseline; specificity is 0.880 versus 0.928.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗