← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.08259 · v1
Fault-Geometry-Aware Control Allocation for Emergency Quadrotor Landing under Single-Motor Loss of Effectiveness
首次提交 2026-11-06 00:34
版本更新 2026-11-06 00:34
雷达观测 2026-11-06 12:09
摘要
Partial single-motor loss of effectiveness (LoE) changes the remaining control-authority geometry of a quadrotor and can change which control allocator performs best during emergency landing[cite: 11]. We compare three allocators in Crazyflie software-in-the-loop simulation: bounded weighted least squares (reported as PINV), a finite-candidate residual allocator (QP-lite), and the same residual allocator with scoring parameters tuned offline by the Cross-Entropy Method (CEM)[cite: 11]. For this study, fault geometry is represented by the known failed-motor index[cite: 11]. At $η=0.496$ remaining effectiveness, matched development trials select CEM for M1, M3, and M4 and PINV for M2; the M3 selection is a one-trial margin (29/30 versus 28/30)[cite: 11]. After freezing this routing map, the policy achieves 117/120 safe first-contact touchdowns on fresh seeds and 115/120 in a separate randomized-order integrated-supervisor evaluation[cite: 11]. For the critical M2/PINV branch, Firth regression gives a nominal $η_{50}\approx0.4956$ with a within-model 95% bootstrap interval of approximately [0.4955, 0.4956][cite: 11]. One-factor-at-a-time $\pm10\%$ plant perturbations shift $η_{50}$ by up to 0.05495 for thrust coefficient and 0.04974 for mass; the most frequent violated first-contact criterion also changes from vertical speed in many conditions to angular rate for mass -10% and thrust-coefficient +10%[cite: 11]. At fixed $η=0.496$, PINV has a higher M2 safe count than frozen CEM in 9/11 tested plant states and ties in 2/11; the two ties are both 0/30[cite: 11]. The experiments therefore distinguish motor-conditioned allocator selection from sensitivity to plant-model mismatch[cite: 11].
作者备注：6 pages, 7 figures, 1 table
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-06 00:34 · 最新观测版本
Fault-Geometry-Aware Control Allocation for Emergency Quadrotor Landing under Single-Motor Loss of Effectiveness
Partial single-motor loss of effectiveness (LoE) changes the remaining control-authority geometry of a quadrotor and can change which control allocator performs best during emergency landing[cite: 11]. We compare three allocators in Crazyflie software-in-the-loop simulation: bounded weighted least squares (reported as PINV), a finite-candidate residual allocator (QP-lite), and the same residual allocator with scoring parameters tuned offline by the Cross-Entropy Method (CEM)[cite: 11]. For this study, fault geometry is represented by the known failed-motor index[cite: 11]. At $η=0.496$ remaining effectiveness, matched development trials select CEM for M1, M3, and M4 and PINV for M2; the M3 selection is a one-trial margin (29/30 versus 28/30)[cite: 11]. After freezing this routing map, the policy achieves 117/120 safe first-contact touchdowns on fresh seeds and 115/120 in a separate randomized-order integrated-supervisor evaluation[cite: 11]. For the critical M2/PINV branch, Firth regression gives a nominal $η_{50}\approx0.4956$ with a within-model 95% bootstrap interval of approximately [0.4955, 0.4956][cite: 11]. One-factor-at-a-time $\pm10\%$ plant perturbations shift $η_{50}$ by up to 0.05495 for thrust coefficient and 0.04974 for mass; the most frequent violated first-contact criterion also changes from vertical speed in many conditions to angular rate for mass -10% and thrust-coefficient +10%[cite: 11]. At fixed $η=0.496$, PINV has a higher M2 safe count than frozen CEM in 9/11 tested plant states and ties in 2/11; the two ties are both 0/30[cite: 11]. The experiments therefore distinguish motor-conditioned allocator selection from sensitivity to plant-model mismatch[cite: 11].
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗