跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.08737 · v1

On Differentially Private Mechanisms for Linear Regression

首次提交 2026-11-06 05:37
版本更新 2026-11-06 05:37
雷达观测 2026-11-09 10:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We study the classic least-squares linear regression problem under differential privacy (DP) in the batch and the continual observation setting. In the latter setting, the mechanism receives a stream of $n$ data points $(x_i,y_i)$ ($x_i\in\mathbb{R}^d$ and $y_i\in\mathbb{R}$) and must output an estimate of the optimal parameters at each time step $i$. Although differentially private linear regression has been extensively studied in the batch setting, the problem remains underexplored for the continual setting, with prior work being restricted to constrained linear regression and update time polynomial in $n$. In this work, we introduce ContinualAdaSSP, the first mechanism for unconstrained linear regression under continual differential privacy. Our mechanism's suboptimality gap is proportional to $\sqrt{d}\operatorname{polylog}(n)$. It requires $O(d^2\log{n})$ space and $O(d^2\log{n}+d^ω)$ update time, where $d$ is the dimension of the input space. We also study fundamental limits of differentially private linear regression by showing the first lower bounds for the box-constrained least-squares linear regression problem. Our lower bounds are proportional to $\min(n,\frac{\sqrt{d}}{\log^{1.5}d})$ for $(1,O(\frac{1}{n}))$-DP, and $\min(n,\frac{d}ε)$ for $ε$-DP, and are derived using a reduction from a fingerprinting code problem from [Peter et al., 2024], providing new insights into the inherent hardness of this canonical task. Our experimental evaluation on real-world datasets shows that the accuracy of our continual observation mechanism clearly outperforms any other known differentially private mechanism for this problem such as rerunning the batch algorithm at each time step.

作者备注:Accepted at NeurIPS 2026

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-06 05:37 · 最新观测版本

On Differentially Private Mechanisms for Linear Regression

We study the classic least-squares linear regression problem under differential privacy (DP) in the batch and the continual observation setting. In the latter setting, the mechanism receives a stream of $n$ data points $(x_i,y_i)$ ($x_i\in\mathbb{R}^d$ and $y_i\in\mathbb{R}$) and must output an estimate of the optimal parameters at each time step $i$. Although differentially private linear regression has been extensively studied in the batch setting, the problem remains underexplored for the continual setting, with prior work being restricted to constrained linear regression and update time polynomial in $n$. In this work, we introduce ContinualAdaSSP, the first mechanism for unconstrained linear regression under continual differential privacy. Our mechanism's suboptimality gap is proportional to $\sqrt{d}\operatorname{polylog}(n)$. It requires $O(d^2\log{n})$ space and $O(d^2\log{n}+d^ω)$ update time, where $d$ is the dimension of the input space. We also study fundamental limits of differentially private linear regression by showing the first lower bounds for the box-constrained least-squares linear regression problem. Our lower bounds are proportional to $\min(n,\frac{\sqrt{d}}{\log^{1.5}d})$ for $(1,O(\frac{1}{n}))$-DP, and $\min(n,\frac{d}ε)$ for $ε$-DP, and are derived using a reduction from a fingerprinting code problem from [Peter et al., 2024], providing new insights into the inherent hardness of this canonical task. Our experimental evaluation on real-world datasets shows that the accuracy of our continual observation mechanism clearly outperforms any other known differentially private mechanism for this problem such as rerunning the batch algorithm at each time step.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗