跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.08798 · v1

Driver Takeovers and Longitudinal Responses Analysis from Naturalistic Driving

首次提交 2026-11-06 07:48
版本更新 2026-11-06 07:48
雷达观测 2026-11-09 10:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

As Level 2 advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) become more widely used, understanding driver-system interaction is increasingly important for traffic safety. However, limited real-world data make these interactions difficult to study. We present ADAS-TO, a naturalistic dataset of 16,446 takeover clips from 364 drivers across 2,585 different drives. It combines road video, vehicle kinematics, driver inputs, and ADAS status. To analyze takeover behavior, we retained 6,206 manually reviewed takeover events during continued lane keeping or car following. We excluded events in which the driver intentionally changed lanes, turned, or made a stop beyond the ADAS's capabilities (e.g., at a red light or stop sign) shortly after takeover. Drivers began intervening before ADAS disengaged in 65.6% of takeovers involving braking or steering. When the ego vehicle was still closing on a lead vehicle at disengagement, longitudinal safety margins often narrowed further after the transfer to manual control. Among 2,031 such events, 78.5% had a lower minimum time-to-collision (TTC) in the five seconds after disengagement than in the five seconds before it. For events involving braking, the mean TTC trajectory reached its minimum about 1.2 s after disengagement. We model the subsequent braking response using a Gazis-Herman-Rothery (GHR) car-following law. Its median five-second spacing root-mean-square error is 1.34 m with observed lead motion and 1.84 m with predicted lead motion. The fitted model expresses braking as a response to looming, with stronger responses at higher speeds and shorter gaps. Applied before takeover, it shows that greater looming than predicted by the human-response reference is associated with disengagement. These findings support continued assessment of longitudinal safety after ADAS disengagement, while the driver's braking response develops.

作者备注:28 pages, 14 figures. See arXiv:2603.06986 for the companion dataset paper. The longitudinal subset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/HenryYHW/ADAS-TO_longitudinal

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-06 07:48 · 最新观测版本

Driver Takeovers and Longitudinal Responses Analysis from Naturalistic Driving

As Level 2 advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) become more widely used, understanding driver-system interaction is increasingly important for traffic safety. However, limited real-world data make these interactions difficult to study. We present ADAS-TO, a naturalistic dataset of 16,446 takeover clips from 364 drivers across 2,585 different drives. It combines road video, vehicle kinematics, driver inputs, and ADAS status. To analyze takeover behavior, we retained 6,206 manually reviewed takeover events during continued lane keeping or car following. We excluded events in which the driver intentionally changed lanes, turned, or made a stop beyond the ADAS's capabilities (e.g., at a red light or stop sign) shortly after takeover. Drivers began intervening before ADAS disengaged in 65.6% of takeovers involving braking or steering. When the ego vehicle was still closing on a lead vehicle at disengagement, longitudinal safety margins often narrowed further after the transfer to manual control. Among 2,031 such events, 78.5% had a lower minimum time-to-collision (TTC) in the five seconds after disengagement than in the five seconds before it. For events involving braking, the mean TTC trajectory reached its minimum about 1.2 s after disengagement. We model the subsequent braking response using a Gazis-Herman-Rothery (GHR) car-following law. Its median five-second spacing root-mean-square error is 1.34 m with observed lead motion and 1.84 m with predicted lead motion. The fitted model expresses braking as a response to looming, with stronger responses at higher speeds and shorter gaps. Applied before takeover, it shows that greater looming than predicted by the human-response reference is associated with disengagement. These findings support continued assessment of longitudinal safety after ADAS disengagement, while the driver's braking response develops.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗