跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.09058 · v1

ProtoCouncil: Multi-Encoder Anatomical Prototypes for Prostate Cancer Detection in Micro-Ultrasound

首次提交 2026-11-06 14:33
版本更新 2026-11-06 14:33
雷达观测 2026-11-09 11:19
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Purpose: Micro-ultrasound ($μ$US) is a promising modality for prostate cancer (PCa) detection, but identifying suspicious tissue depends heavily on clinical experience. Models trained on sparse, noisy core-level pathology offer little insight into their decisions and can fail under domain shift. Clinical use needs a traceable decision process and a flag for uncertain predictions. Methods: We introduce ProtoCouncil, in which three foundation encoders (MedSAM, DINOv3 and V-JEPA 2.1) learn case-based prototypes at three anatomical levels: whole gland, needle track and gland sectors. Prototypes are projected onto real training-core regions, and label-free fusion keeps every class logit as a bias plus an exact sum of prototype similarity contributions. Encoder disagreement triggers selective prediction. Results: In five-fold patient-level cross-validation (6,588 cores, 693 patients), ProtoCouncil reaches 82.9% AUROC for clinically significant PCa (csPCa, Grade Group $\geq$3), 4.3 points above the best previously published method. In zero-shot evaluation on two external cohorts, ProtoCouncil achieves higher all-cancer and csPCa AUROC than all previous methods. Nearest same-class exemplars match test-core tumor involvement better than random same-class cases. Externally, csPCa accuracy falls from 79% when encoders agree to 27% when two oppose the fused call. Abstaining on disagreement raises balanced accuracy by 7 and 15 points, while retaining 58% and 54% of the cores. Conclusion: ProtoCouncil grounds core-level predictions in exact similarity-based evidence from real, anatomically indexed training cases, which makes its reasoning interpretable. It achieves the highest csPCa AUROC across three cohorts and identifies unreliable predictions through encoder disagreement.

作者备注:12 pages, 3 figures, Under Review

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-06 14:33 · 最新观测版本

ProtoCouncil: Multi-Encoder Anatomical Prototypes for Prostate Cancer Detection in Micro-Ultrasound

Purpose: Micro-ultrasound ($μ$US) is a promising modality for prostate cancer (PCa) detection, but identifying suspicious tissue depends heavily on clinical experience. Models trained on sparse, noisy core-level pathology offer little insight into their decisions and can fail under domain shift. Clinical use needs a traceable decision process and a flag for uncertain predictions. Methods: We introduce ProtoCouncil, in which three foundation encoders (MedSAM, DINOv3 and V-JEPA 2.1) learn case-based prototypes at three anatomical levels: whole gland, needle track and gland sectors. Prototypes are projected onto real training-core regions, and label-free fusion keeps every class logit as a bias plus an exact sum of prototype similarity contributions. Encoder disagreement triggers selective prediction. Results: In five-fold patient-level cross-validation (6,588 cores, 693 patients), ProtoCouncil reaches 82.9% AUROC for clinically significant PCa (csPCa, Grade Group $\geq$3), 4.3 points above the best previously published method. In zero-shot evaluation on two external cohorts, ProtoCouncil achieves higher all-cancer and csPCa AUROC than all previous methods. Nearest same-class exemplars match test-core tumor involvement better than random same-class cases. Externally, csPCa accuracy falls from 79% when encoders agree to 27% when two oppose the fused call. Abstaining on disagreement raises balanced accuracy by 7 and 15 points, while retaining 58% and 54% of the cores. Conclusion: ProtoCouncil grounds core-level predictions in exact similarity-based evidence from real, anatomically indexed training cases, which makes its reasoning interpretable. It achieves the highest csPCa AUROC across three cohorts and identifies unreliable predictions through encoder disagreement.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗