← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.09085 · v1
The Invisible Gap: Romanized Indic Generation Fails Where Automatic Metrics Succeed
首次提交 2026-11-06 15:17
版本更新 2026-11-06 15:17
雷达观测 2026-11-09 11:19
摘要
Hundreds of millions of Indians communicate with digital systems in romanized Latin characters -- typing "aap kaise hain" rather than native script -- yet romanized Indic generation is absent from NLP benchmarks and evaluation frameworks. We demonstrate that automatic metrics (BGE-M3, BERTScore) systematically misrepresent the quality of romanized Hindi, Telugu, and Kannada generation. We evaluate four LLMs (Claude Opus 4.8, GPT-5.5, Gemini 2.5-flash, Qwen3.5-35B) on 142 OpenAssistant query-response pairs. On a 72-response diagnostic subset, native speakers rate GPT-5.5 1.43 points higher than Claude Opus 4.8 on a 12-point rubric, whereas their full-dataset BGE-M3 means differ by only 0.004. Two distinct model-specific failure modes emerge: Gemini produces script spillage (16.9% of Telugu responses leak native script), while Qwen collapses to English-only output (16.2% of Kannada responses). We introduce a failure-aware evaluation policy that assigns zero to empty outputs, script-corrupted responses, and instruction collapses -- revealing failures metrics alone cannot detect. Our results show that evaluating romanized Indic generation requires a coordinated bundle: semantic similarity, script compliance, failure coverage, and native-speaker acceptability.
作者备注：11 pages, 2 figures, 5 tables. All authors contributed equally
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-06 15:17 · 最新观测版本
The Invisible Gap: Romanized Indic Generation Fails Where Automatic Metrics Succeed
Hundreds of millions of Indians communicate with digital systems in romanized Latin characters -- typing "aap kaise hain" rather than native script -- yet romanized Indic generation is absent from NLP benchmarks and evaluation frameworks. We demonstrate that automatic metrics (BGE-M3, BERTScore) systematically misrepresent the quality of romanized Hindi, Telugu, and Kannada generation. We evaluate four LLMs (Claude Opus 4.8, GPT-5.5, Gemini 2.5-flash, Qwen3.5-35B) on 142 OpenAssistant query-response pairs. On a 72-response diagnostic subset, native speakers rate GPT-5.5 1.43 points higher than Claude Opus 4.8 on a 12-point rubric, whereas their full-dataset BGE-M3 means differ by only 0.004. Two distinct model-specific failure modes emerge: Gemini produces script spillage (16.9% of Telugu responses leak native script), while Qwen collapses to English-only output (16.2% of Kannada responses). We introduce a failure-aware evaluation policy that assigns zero to empty outputs, script-corrupted responses, and instruction collapses -- revealing failures metrics alone cannot detect. Our results show that evaluating romanized Indic generation requires a coordinated bundle: semantic similarity, script compliance, failure coverage, and native-speaker acceptability.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗