← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.09094 · v1
AlienBench: A Benchmark of Structural Novelty in Language Model Outputs
首次提交 2026-11-06 15:23
版本更新 2026-11-06 15:23
雷达观测 2026-11-09 11:19
摘要
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for creative tasks such as writing, design, and idea generation. For these uses, it matters whether a model's ideas depart from familiar examples or stay close to them. Novelty is one standard measure of creativity, and current creativity evaluations ask human experts or LLM judges to rate how novel an output is. However, these ratings have no fixed reference for what counts as novel (or, in other terms, departure from the familiar). Measuring this departure requires a task with known familiar defaults. The structured imagination task from cognitive psychology is such a task. In this creativity test, people imagine a creature from another planet. The departure from features of Earth animals, such as bilateral symmetry and legs as mode of locomotion, is used as measure of creativity. We introduce AlienBench, a benchmark that adapts the structured imagination task to language models. Models describe alien creatures, and a panel of three LLM judges extracts ten biological features from the description and labels them as either Earth-typical or a departure. The sum of feature departures is the score of a description, from 0 to 10. Each model describes alien creatures under six prompt conditions that vary the framing of the task and the planetary environment. Each model generates 30 descriptions per condition (180 in total), and its overall score is the mean across these descriptions. We evaluate 10 language models, from frontier to open-weight models. Overall scores range from 3.28 (GPT-6 Luna) to 6.55 (Ministral 3 14B). Interestingly, open-weight models score higher than proprietary models in this task (5.40 vs. 4.58). Under the baseline prompt, the models depart from Earth defaults more often on average than 100 human participants on every feature. We release all prompts, generations, judge outputs, and scores.
作者备注：21 pages, 2 figures, 13 tables
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-06 15:23 · 最新观测版本
AlienBench: A Benchmark of Structural Novelty in Language Model Outputs
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for creative tasks such as writing, design, and idea generation. For these uses, it matters whether a model's ideas depart from familiar examples or stay close to them. Novelty is one standard measure of creativity, and current creativity evaluations ask human experts or LLM judges to rate how novel an output is. However, these ratings have no fixed reference for what counts as novel (or, in other terms, departure from the familiar). Measuring this departure requires a task with known familiar defaults. The structured imagination task from cognitive psychology is such a task. In this creativity test, people imagine a creature from another planet. The departure from features of Earth animals, such as bilateral symmetry and legs as mode of locomotion, is used as measure of creativity. We introduce AlienBench, a benchmark that adapts the structured imagination task to language models. Models describe alien creatures, and a panel of three LLM judges extracts ten biological features from the description and labels them as either Earth-typical or a departure. The sum of feature departures is the score of a description, from 0 to 10. Each model describes alien creatures under six prompt conditions that vary the framing of the task and the planetary environment. Each model generates 30 descriptions per condition (180 in total), and its overall score is the mean across these descriptions. We evaluate 10 language models, from frontier to open-weight models. Overall scores range from 3.28 (GPT-6 Luna) to 6.55 (Ministral 3 14B). Interestingly, open-weight models score higher than proprietary models in this task (5.40 vs. 4.58). Under the baseline prompt, the models depart from Earth defaults more often on average than 100 human participants on every feature. We release all prompts, generations, judge outputs, and scores.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗