← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.09177 · v1
Analyzing Code Provenance in LLMs for Programming Education
首次提交 2026-11-06 16:59
版本更新 2026-11-06 16:59
雷达观测 2026-11-09 11:19
摘要
Large language models (LLMs) play an increasing role in programming education, challenging traditional assessment methods as they can generate fully functional code instantly. This disrupts the reliability of student submissions as indicators of learning and effort. To address this issue, code provenance is essential for tracing the origins of code and distinguishing student-authored, AI-generated, and externally sourced components. We extend the Min-K% probability approach by incorporating synthetic non-member code generation and apply it to Python code for membership inference and provenance tracking. Evaluations cover free LLMs such as GPT-2, DistilGPT-2, and DialoGPT, as well as state-of-the-art commercial models including GPT-5, Gemini 2.5, Mistral, DeepSeek, and LLaMA 3.3. Before evaluating our approach on higher-education student assignments, we validate its feasibility using Stack Overflow data. The results show that free models enable more sensitive code memorization detection than commercial models. By systematically comparing these LLMs, we assess trade-offs between detection accuracy and privacy protection, taking an initial step toward effective assessment of AI-assisted programming education through combined provenance detection and process visibility.
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-06 16:59 · 最新观测版本
Analyzing Code Provenance in LLMs for Programming Education
Large language models (LLMs) play an increasing role in programming education, challenging traditional assessment methods as they can generate fully functional code instantly. This disrupts the reliability of student submissions as indicators of learning and effort. To address this issue, code provenance is essential for tracing the origins of code and distinguishing student-authored, AI-generated, and externally sourced components. We extend the Min-K% probability approach by incorporating synthetic non-member code generation and apply it to Python code for membership inference and provenance tracking. Evaluations cover free LLMs such as GPT-2, DistilGPT-2, and DialoGPT, as well as state-of-the-art commercial models including GPT-5, Gemini 2.5, Mistral, DeepSeek, and LLaMA 3.3. Before evaluating our approach on higher-education student assignments, we validate its feasibility using Stack Overflow data. The results show that free models enable more sensitive code memorization detection than commercial models. By systematically comparing these LLMs, we assess trade-offs between detection accuracy and privacy protection, taking an initial step toward effective assessment of AI-assisted programming education through combined provenance detection and process visibility.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗