跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.09552 · v1

Towards Sustainable Federated Learning via Carbon-Aware Client Selection

首次提交 2026-11-06 22:59
版本更新 2026-11-06 22:59
雷达观测 2026-11-09 13:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

The Information/Communication Technology (ICT) industry is severely challenging the global environment due to the sharply rising carbon emissions generated by machine learning (ML) workloads. Federated Learning (FL) is one of the prominent distributed ML systems used in applications with billions of client devices, such as Google Gboard and Apple Siri. Nearly half of the total carbon footprint in FL originates from client-side computation during local training. However, existing client selection strategies in FL primarily focus on minimizing energy consumption rather than carbon emissions, despite the fact that carbon impact depends not only on computational load but also on the underlying carbon intensity of the energy source. In this paper, we address this gap by proposing a carbon-aware fair client selection strategy (CA-FCS) designed to minimize the carbon emissions associated with model training on client devices. In contrast to existing approaches for reducing carbon emissions in FL, we incorporate hourly carbon intensity and a realistic energy consumption model developed using empirical measurements from Google Pixel smartphones to estimate client-side carbon emissions in FL. Since repeatedly selecting low-carbon clients may reduce data diversity and degrade global model performance, particularly under non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) data settings, CA-FCS incorporates fairness into client selection to mitigate this issue. We conduct extensive experiments under realistic FL settings for mobile devices, where client participation is constrained by device availability conditions, such as charging status and Wi-Fi connectivity. The results demonstrate that our method reduces client-side carbon emissions by up to 46% while maintaining competitive model accuracy.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-06 22:59 · 最新观测版本

Towards Sustainable Federated Learning via Carbon-Aware Client Selection

The Information/Communication Technology (ICT) industry is severely challenging the global environment due to the sharply rising carbon emissions generated by machine learning (ML) workloads. Federated Learning (FL) is one of the prominent distributed ML systems used in applications with billions of client devices, such as Google Gboard and Apple Siri. Nearly half of the total carbon footprint in FL originates from client-side computation during local training. However, existing client selection strategies in FL primarily focus on minimizing energy consumption rather than carbon emissions, despite the fact that carbon impact depends not only on computational load but also on the underlying carbon intensity of the energy source. In this paper, we address this gap by proposing a carbon-aware fair client selection strategy (CA-FCS) designed to minimize the carbon emissions associated with model training on client devices. In contrast to existing approaches for reducing carbon emissions in FL, we incorporate hourly carbon intensity and a realistic energy consumption model developed using empirical measurements from Google Pixel smartphones to estimate client-side carbon emissions in FL. Since repeatedly selecting low-carbon clients may reduce data diversity and degrade global model performance, particularly under non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) data settings, CA-FCS incorporates fairness into client selection to mitigate this issue. We conduct extensive experiments under realistic FL settings for mobile devices, where client participation is constrained by device availability conditions, such as charging status and Wi-Fi connectivity. The results demonstrate that our method reduces client-side carbon emissions by up to 46% while maintaining competitive model accuracy.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗