跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.09622 · v1

On Positive Computation

首次提交 2026-11-06 23:43
版本更新 2026-11-06 23:43
雷达观测 2026-11-09 13:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We introduce new notions of reducibility for monotone classes and show that a monotone version of Circuit Satisfiability and the Hamiltonian Cycle Problem are complete for $mNP$, even under positive reductions (which are not the same as monotone reductions). If this holds for all (monotone) $mNP$-complete problems - that they are also so complete for $mNP$ -, then $P\neq NP$. We introduce positive models of relativized computation and show that the separation $posP\subsetneq mNP$ does not relativize, even when oracles are restricted to monotone sets. Yet, there is a (weak) diagonalization proof that $posP\subsetneq mNP$.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-06 23:43 · 最新观测版本

On Positive Computation

We introduce new notions of reducibility for monotone classes and show that a monotone version of Circuit Satisfiability and the Hamiltonian Cycle Problem are complete for $mNP$, even under positive reductions (which are not the same as monotone reductions). If this holds for all (monotone) $mNP$-complete problems - that they are also so complete for $mNP$ -, then $P\neq NP$. We introduce positive models of relativized computation and show that the separation $posP\subsetneq mNP$ does not relativize, even when oracles are restricted to monotone sets. Yet, there is a (weak) diagonalization proof that $posP\subsetneq mNP$.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗