跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.09712 · v1

ICare-DT: a digital twin for continuous forecasting of intensive care patients

首次提交 2026-11-07 00:55
版本更新 2026-11-07 00:55
雷达观测 2026-11-09 13:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Digital twins of intensive care patients should update forecasts from new data and predict treatment responses, but few studies test whether routine records support either. We propose ICare-DT, a Transformer-based twin that updates a latent patient state hourly from new measurements without retraining. We trained it on 140,473 eICU-CRD stays to forecast vital signs crossing their training-set means. On test data, later forecasts beat the twin's own hour-6 forecasts of the same windows in all 12 settings (+0.073 to +0.153 AUROC). On validation data, controls that withheld or swapped the new hours traced the gain to the patient's own measurements. Without refitting, the model kept its gain on a second database (8 of 9 settings, +0.025 to +0.114 AUROC) in a prespecified evaluation of the previously analyzed MIMIC-IV test split. Refitted within MIMIC-IV, a twin state fine-tuned on clinical endpoints gave gradient boosting a significant gain for acute kidney injury (+0.0035 AUROC; hypotension +0.0010, not significant). To test response prediction, we built a benchmark that replaces the treatments in real records with simulated doses and injects responses of known size, visible only at measurement times. Ridge models supervised with injected effects recovered them from real records only through frequently measured variables (heart rate) read at their measurement times. We asked standard learners to predict these effects for a dosing regime no patient had received. No standard learner outperformed predicting zero effect at an out-of-support query. When told how the simulated responses were generated, a separate learner recovered the effects from the same records without seeing their true values (R2 0.30 to 0.40 at one effect size). Routine records support forecasts that improve with each patient's new data, and our benchmark is a testbed for models that learn how responses are generated.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-07 00:55 · 最新观测版本

ICare-DT: a digital twin for continuous forecasting of intensive care patients

Digital twins of intensive care patients should update forecasts from new data and predict treatment responses, but few studies test whether routine records support either. We propose ICare-DT, a Transformer-based twin that updates a latent patient state hourly from new measurements without retraining. We trained it on 140,473 eICU-CRD stays to forecast vital signs crossing their training-set means. On test data, later forecasts beat the twin's own hour-6 forecasts of the same windows in all 12 settings (+0.073 to +0.153 AUROC). On validation data, controls that withheld or swapped the new hours traced the gain to the patient's own measurements. Without refitting, the model kept its gain on a second database (8 of 9 settings, +0.025 to +0.114 AUROC) in a prespecified evaluation of the previously analyzed MIMIC-IV test split. Refitted within MIMIC-IV, a twin state fine-tuned on clinical endpoints gave gradient boosting a significant gain for acute kidney injury (+0.0035 AUROC; hypotension +0.0010, not significant). To test response prediction, we built a benchmark that replaces the treatments in real records with simulated doses and injects responses of known size, visible only at measurement times. Ridge models supervised with injected effects recovered them from real records only through frequently measured variables (heart rate) read at their measurement times. We asked standard learners to predict these effects for a dosing regime no patient had received. No standard learner outperformed predicting zero effect at an out-of-support query. When told how the simulated responses were generated, a separate learner recovered the effects from the same records without seeing their true values (R2 0.30 to 0.40 at one effect size). Routine records support forecasts that improve with each patient's new data, and our benchmark is a testbed for models that learn how responses are generated.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗