跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.09780 · v1

Strategic Competition and Convergence in LLM Leaderboards

LLM排行榜中的策略竞争与趋同

首次提交 2026-11-07 01:42
版本更新 2026-11-07 01:42
雷达观测 2026-11-09 13:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Leaderboards are a popular way to compare large language model (LLM) capabilities and can influence how model developers invest resources. We ask when competition on leaderboards leads developers to produce models with similar capability profiles, which we call monoculture, or similar performance levels. We study this by formulating leaderboard competition as a game in which model developers invest resources across capabilities to maximize their win rate. We show that similar production functions can induce similar capability profiles, while comparative advantage can sustain distinct capability profiles. We then study convergence in performance levels and show that diminishing returns can lead to an increasingly crowded competitive frontier. Using data from LM Arena and OpenRouter, we find that developers improve more in categories where they lag competitors, while still retaining category-specific advantages. At the same time, we find that the frontier of models becomes increasingly crowded, alongside increasingly diversified model usage patterns. Our results suggest that increasing competition does not need to produce interchangeable models, but can instead sustain competitive models with distinct strengths.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

作者将排行榜竞争建模为开发者在不同能力上分配资源的博弈,分析能力画像趋同(单一化)与性能水平收敛的条件,并用LM Arena和OpenRouter数据做经验观察。

正在读取账号与研究记录…

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-07 01:42 · 最新观测版本

Strategic Competition and Convergence in LLM Leaderboards

Leaderboards are a popular way to compare large language model (LLM) capabilities and can influence how model developers invest resources. We ask when competition on leaderboards leads developers to produce models with similar capability profiles, which we call monoculture, or similar performance levels. We study this by formulating leaderboard competition as a game in which model developers invest resources across capabilities to maximize their win rate. We show that similar production functions can induce similar capability profiles, while comparative advantage can sustain distinct capability profiles. We then study convergence in performance levels and show that diminishing returns can lead to an increasingly crowded competitive frontier. Using data from LM Arena and OpenRouter, we find that developers improve more in categories where they lag competitors, while still retaining category-specific advantages. At the same time, we find that the frontier of models becomes increasingly crowded, alongside increasingly diversified model usage patterns. Our results suggest that increasing competition does not need to produce interchangeable models, but can instead sustain competitive models with distinct strengths.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗