跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.09846 · v1

Ensemble Methodology for Reference-Free Confidence Estimation in LLM-based Code Summarization

基于集成的LLM代码摘要无参考置信度估计方法

首次提交 2026-11-07 02:29
版本更新 2026-11-07 02:29
雷达观测 2026-11-09 13:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

This paper describes an approach and use case to estimate the correctness of LLM-generated COBOL summaries without access to human-authored references. The core intuition is that inter-model agreement on semantics is informative about truth, and that an LLM-as-judge can provide higher-fidelity pairwise assessments than traditional string- or embedding-based metrics. We operationalise this intuition with (i) controlled summary generation from diverse models; (ii) a LLM evaluator that compares pairs of summaries and emits structured judgments; and (iii) a calibrated aggregation rule that combines supportive evidence while penalising only corroborated contradictions.

作者备注:9 pages, 3 figures, 1 table

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

提出一种无需人工参考摘要、通过多模型语义一致性与LLM评判器聚合来估计LLM生成COBOL摘要正确性的集成方法。

正在读取账号与研究记录…

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-07 02:29 · 最新观测版本

Ensemble Methodology for Reference-Free Confidence Estimation in LLM-based Code Summarization

This paper describes an approach and use case to estimate the correctness of LLM-generated COBOL summaries without access to human-authored references. The core intuition is that inter-model agreement on semantics is informative about truth, and that an LLM-as-judge can provide higher-fidelity pairwise assessments than traditional string- or embedding-based metrics. We operationalise this intuition with (i) controlled summary generation from diverse models; (ii) a LLM evaluator that compares pairs of summaries and emits structured judgments; and (iii) a calibrated aggregation rule that combines supportive evidence while penalising only corroborated contradictions.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗