跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.10037 · v1

Toward Safety-Aware AI Agents in Realistic Social Engineering Attack Scenarios

首次提交 2026-11-06 01:11
版本更新 2026-11-06 01:11
雷达观测 2026-11-10 10:12
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Personal AI agents are increasingly deployed on user devices to execute actions involving real money and sensitive data, but their security under social engineering attacks has not been systematically evaluated. We propose SEA (Social Engineering Attack Benchmark), the first interactive environment for evaluating the intrinsic security capability of AI agents in social engineering attack scenarios, covering 8 daily-life domains, 30+ simulated applications, a 4-level difficulty gradient, and a 5-dimensional evaluation framework, with 320 evaluation tasks designed in consultation with anti-fraud specialists and spanning two culturally distinct settings in Chinese and English. Evaluation on 11 frontier open-source and closed-source models, with GPT-6 evaluated only in Chinese, reveals that all models are breached to varying degrees (Chinese attack success rates ranging from 16.9% to 84.3%) proactive verification rates universally below 32%. We further propose META-SEA, a co-evolutionary framework for attack tasks and defenders. With META-SEA training, Qwen3-8B achieves defense performance comparable to closed-source models while effectively reducing ungrounded action claims.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-06 01:11 · 最新观测版本

Toward Safety-Aware AI Agents in Realistic Social Engineering Attack Scenarios

Personal AI agents are increasingly deployed on user devices to execute actions involving real money and sensitive data, but their security under social engineering attacks has not been systematically evaluated. We propose SEA (Social Engineering Attack Benchmark), the first interactive environment for evaluating the intrinsic security capability of AI agents in social engineering attack scenarios, covering 8 daily-life domains, 30+ simulated applications, a 4-level difficulty gradient, and a 5-dimensional evaluation framework, with 320 evaluation tasks designed in consultation with anti-fraud specialists and spanning two culturally distinct settings in Chinese and English. Evaluation on 11 frontier open-source and closed-source models, with GPT-6 evaluated only in Chinese, reveals that all models are breached to varying degrees (Chinese attack success rates ranging from 16.9% to 84.3%) proactive verification rates universally below 32%. We further propose META-SEA, a co-evolutionary framework for attack tasks and defenders. With META-SEA training, Qwen3-8B achieves defense performance comparable to closed-source models while effectively reducing ungrounded action claims.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗