跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.10175 · v1

ASCENT: Scale-Complementary External State for Frozen Long-Context Language Models

首次提交 2026-11-07 03:54
版本更新 2026-11-07 03:54
雷达观测 2026-11-10 10:11
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

External state should become more valuable as a reader becomes more capable, yet long-context evaluations measure memory utility at a single model scale. This paper formulates scale complementarity: the absolute gain from external state increases when reader capacity and a compact state budget are jointly scaled. ASCENT realizes this principle with a target-blind causal writer, nested typed state, and a bounded query-conditioned readout; every language model remains frozen. Under log loss, the value of a nested refinement equals its target-relevant conditional information; a full factorial makes the reader-by-state interaction identifiable. Official 16K BABILong experiments show Qwen2.5 accuracy gains of 10.50, 78.88, and 82.63 percentage points at 0.5B, 1.5B, and 3B parameters, with both adjacent directional contrasts significant after family-wise correction. At 7B, Foundation accuracy rises to 33.25% while four-slot ASCENT answers every question, which caps the gain at 66.75 points; the 3B-to-7B accuracy increment is -15.88 points [-20.55, -11.20]. The accuracy-side claim is therefore established from 0.5B to 3B; the 7B conclusion rests on the non-saturated negative-log-likelihood factorial. A three-model by three-state factorial yields co-scaled negative log-likelihood gains of 0.388, 2.099, and 7.406 nats at 1.5B, 3B, and 7B; all interaction and gain contrasts retain positive simultaneous lower bounds. Five public 7B-8B readers obtain 66.75-85.63 point gains, and ASCENT exceeds task-trained retrieval checkpoints at the two larger shared scales. Controls, baselines, systems accounting, matched-hardware reproduction, and a cross-architecture sensitivity analysis accompany the experiments. The results establish scale-complementary external state under the evaluated benchmarks, metrics, and state schema.

作者备注:39 pages, 4 figures. Author-formatted version of the article published in Array 32 (2026) 101399. Code: https://github.com/XingjianZhang-dev/ascent

期刊信息:Array 32 (2026) 101399

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-07 03:54 · 最新观测版本

ASCENT: Scale-Complementary External State for Frozen Long-Context Language Models

External state should become more valuable as a reader becomes more capable, yet long-context evaluations measure memory utility at a single model scale. This paper formulates scale complementarity: the absolute gain from external state increases when reader capacity and a compact state budget are jointly scaled. ASCENT realizes this principle with a target-blind causal writer, nested typed state, and a bounded query-conditioned readout; every language model remains frozen. Under log loss, the value of a nested refinement equals its target-relevant conditional information; a full factorial makes the reader-by-state interaction identifiable. Official 16K BABILong experiments show Qwen2.5 accuracy gains of 10.50, 78.88, and 82.63 percentage points at 0.5B, 1.5B, and 3B parameters, with both adjacent directional contrasts significant after family-wise correction. At 7B, Foundation accuracy rises to 33.25% while four-slot ASCENT answers every question, which caps the gain at 66.75 points; the 3B-to-7B accuracy increment is -15.88 points [-20.55, -11.20]. The accuracy-side claim is therefore established from 0.5B to 3B; the 7B conclusion rests on the non-saturated negative-log-likelihood factorial. A three-model by three-state factorial yields co-scaled negative log-likelihood gains of 0.388, 2.099, and 7.406 nats at 1.5B, 3B, and 7B; all interaction and gain contrasts retain positive simultaneous lower bounds. Five public 7B-8B readers obtain 66.75-85.63 point gains, and ASCENT exceeds task-trained retrieval checkpoints at the two larger shared scales. Controls, baselines, systems accounting, matched-hardware reproduction, and a cross-architecture sensitivity analysis accompany the experiments. The results establish scale-complementary external state under the evaluated benchmarks, metrics, and state schema.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗