跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.10181 · v1

A Note on the Hardness of Partially Dynamic Max Flow

首次提交 2026-11-07 04:02
版本更新 2026-11-07 04:02
雷达观测 2026-11-10 10:11
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We study the fine-grained complexity of partially dynamic max flow in capacitated graphs. Assuming the combinatorial 4-clique hypothesis, combinatorial algorithms require $Ω(n^{2-o(1)})$ amortized update time. Thus, recomputing max flow after each update is optimal up to subpolynomial factors for combinatorial algorithms in dense graphs. The previous conditional lower bound was $Ω(n^{1-o(1)})$ amortized update time under SETH or the OMv hypothesis and applies to all algorithms [Dah16].

作者备注:SOSA 2027

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-07 04:02 · 最新观测版本

A Note on the Hardness of Partially Dynamic Max Flow

We study the fine-grained complexity of partially dynamic max flow in capacitated graphs. Assuming the combinatorial 4-clique hypothesis, combinatorial algorithms require $Ω(n^{2-o(1)})$ amortized update time. Thus, recomputing max flow after each update is optimal up to subpolynomial factors for combinatorial algorithms in dense graphs. The previous conditional lower bound was $Ω(n^{1-o(1)})$ amortized update time under SETH or the OMv hypothesis and applies to all algorithms [Dah16].

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗