跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.10307 · v1

How Much Is Left Matters: False Positives and False Negatives in Partial-Prompt Contamination Tests

首次提交 2026-11-07 07:13
版本更新 2026-11-07 07:13
雷达观测 2026-11-10 10:11
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Partial-prompt completion, where a model receives the first part of a benchmark problem and is checked for whether it reproduces the rest, is a widely used test for benchmark contamination. We audit this test on seven open-weight models using MATH-500 and recent AIME 2025/2026 problems, which serve as true negatives. Memorization flags depend strongly on how much text remains: for every model, problems with at most 8 leftover words are flagged several times more often than problems with at least 25 (31.5% vs. 5.5% for Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct), and half to three-quarters of all ROUGE-based flags come from short leftovers. On true negatives, a ROUGE-L >= 0.75 threshold flags up to 6.7% of problems at a 60% prefix, and at an 80% prefix even exact match flags 8.6% (pooled over models; 6.2% on AIME 2026, which postdates every model), against 0% at 40-60%. The test also misses contamination upstream: models distilled from Qwen2.5-Math, whose base is heavily flagged in prior work, show almost no model-specific recall. Calibrating each model against models from other families removes most flags while isolating a consistent Qwen2.5-specific signal at every prefix length. We recommend length-stratified reporting, prefixes of at most 60%, style-matched post-cutoff controls, and cross-family calibration.

作者备注:10 pages, 2 figures, 3 tables

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-07 07:13 · 最新观测版本

How Much Is Left Matters: False Positives and False Negatives in Partial-Prompt Contamination Tests

Partial-prompt completion, where a model receives the first part of a benchmark problem and is checked for whether it reproduces the rest, is a widely used test for benchmark contamination. We audit this test on seven open-weight models using MATH-500 and recent AIME 2025/2026 problems, which serve as true negatives. Memorization flags depend strongly on how much text remains: for every model, problems with at most 8 leftover words are flagged several times more often than problems with at least 25 (31.5% vs. 5.5% for Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct), and half to three-quarters of all ROUGE-based flags come from short leftovers. On true negatives, a ROUGE-L >= 0.75 threshold flags up to 6.7% of problems at a 60% prefix, and at an 80% prefix even exact match flags 8.6% (pooled over models; 6.2% on AIME 2026, which postdates every model), against 0% at 40-60%. The test also misses contamination upstream: models distilled from Qwen2.5-Math, whose base is heavily flagged in prior work, show almost no model-specific recall. Calibrating each model against models from other families removes most flags while isolating a consistent Qwen2.5-specific signal at every prefix length. We recommend length-stratified reporting, prefixes of at most 60%, style-matched post-cutoff controls, and cross-family calibration.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗