跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.10345 · v1

The Power of Two Choices in Dynamic Pricing: As Good As Full Feedback, Instance-Wise

首次提交 2026-11-07 08:26
版本更新 2026-11-07 08:26
雷达观测 2026-11-10 10:11
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We study the dynamic pricing problem, where a firm sells a product to $T$ myopic customers and their values are independent samples from an unknown value distribution $F$. With posted prices, the firm only sees whether each customer buys, and the minimax regret is $\widetilde Θ(T^{2/3})$ [KL03]. A menu instead offers several options, each selling the product with some probability at some expected payment. Infinitely many menu options allow the seller to fully reveal customer values, reducing the regret to $Θ(\sqrt T)$. How many options are needed? Perhaps surprisingly, a second menu option suffices, achieving the same regret as infinite menus (up to $\log$ factors). This holds broadly: without knowing any property of $F$, our algorithm with two menu options attains $\tilde O(\sqrt T)$ regret in general, $\tilde O(T^{1/3})$ regret for monotone-hazard-rate distributions, and $\tilde O(T^{d/(d+1)})$ instance-dependent regret when $d\in(0,1)$ is a suitable notion of "dimension". All are optimal even with infinite menus. Moreover, we argue, via a novel lower-bound construction, that our algorithm is near-optimal for each problem instance. Along the way, we study the query complexity of revenue maximization, where an algorithm issues a query to each customer to learn the property of interest (either the best price or the CDF) up to some precision. We show that interval queries suffice to achieve the same query complexity as value queries (up to $\log$ factors) for both properties and across several classes of value distributions. We provide a new interval-query algorithm for each property. The best-price-estimation algorithm is the key ingredient in our main dynamic pricing algorithm, and the CDF-estimation algorithm underpins a simpler algorithm attaining $\tilde O(\sqrt T)$ regret with three menu options.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-07 08:26 · 最新观测版本

The Power of Two Choices in Dynamic Pricing: As Good As Full Feedback, Instance-Wise

We study the dynamic pricing problem, where a firm sells a product to $T$ myopic customers and their values are independent samples from an unknown value distribution $F$. With posted prices, the firm only sees whether each customer buys, and the minimax regret is $\widetilde Θ(T^{2/3})$ [KL03]. A menu instead offers several options, each selling the product with some probability at some expected payment. Infinitely many menu options allow the seller to fully reveal customer values, reducing the regret to $Θ(\sqrt T)$. How many options are needed? Perhaps surprisingly, a second menu option suffices, achieving the same regret as infinite menus (up to $\log$ factors). This holds broadly: without knowing any property of $F$, our algorithm with two menu options attains $\tilde O(\sqrt T)$ regret in general, $\tilde O(T^{1/3})$ regret for monotone-hazard-rate distributions, and $\tilde O(T^{d/(d+1)})$ instance-dependent regret when $d\in(0,1)$ is a suitable notion of "dimension". All are optimal even with infinite menus. Moreover, we argue, via a novel lower-bound construction, that our algorithm is near-optimal for each problem instance. Along the way, we study the query complexity of revenue maximization, where an algorithm issues a query to each customer to learn the property of interest (either the best price or the CDF) up to some precision. We show that interval queries suffice to achieve the same query complexity as value queries (up to $\log$ factors) for both properties and across several classes of value distributions. We provide a new interval-query algorithm for each property. The best-price-estimation algorithm is the key ingredient in our main dynamic pricing algorithm, and the CDF-estimation algorithm underpins a simpler algorithm attaining $\tilde O(\sqrt T)$ regret with three menu options.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗