跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.10628 · v1

Towards Identity-Preserving LLM Agents under Model Transition

首次提交 2026-11-07 18:10
版本更新 2026-11-07 18:10
雷达观测 2026-11-10 11:14
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

When an LLM agent's backend model is upgraded or replaced, operators typically reload the same persona, memory, and rules onto the new model and assume the agent will behave as before. We show this assumption requires empirical validation-and that whether identity is preserved depends on the specific model pairing. Across 5,760 compliance-testing runs in 12 regulated domains with three open-weight models, we find that some transitions produce significant behavioral drift while others do not, even when the agent's external state remains identical. Crucially, this drift is invisible to verbal verification: every model claims full policy compliance, yet actual decisions under pressure differ across models. The same external state can reorder which model is most compliant-a large positive effect on one substrate, negligible on the other two. Practitioners should treat model transitions as behavioral changes requiring action-level empirical testing, not as transparent infrastructure operations.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-07 18:10 · 最新观测版本

Towards Identity-Preserving LLM Agents under Model Transition

When an LLM agent's backend model is upgraded or replaced, operators typically reload the same persona, memory, and rules onto the new model and assume the agent will behave as before. We show this assumption requires empirical validation-and that whether identity is preserved depends on the specific model pairing. Across 5,760 compliance-testing runs in 12 regulated domains with three open-weight models, we find that some transitions produce significant behavioral drift while others do not, even when the agent's external state remains identical. Crucially, this drift is invisible to verbal verification: every model claims full policy compliance, yet actual decisions under pressure differ across models. The same external state can reorder which model is most compliant-a large positive effect on one substrate, negligible on the other two. Practitioners should treat model transitions as behavioral changes requiring action-level empirical testing, not as transparent infrastructure operations.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗