跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.10720 · v1

Locating and Repairing Domain Shift in VLM Trajectory Planning

首次提交 2026-11-07 21:28
版本更新 2026-11-07 21:28
雷达观测 2026-11-10 11:14
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly adopted as end-to-end driving planners, yet they suffer from cross-city domain shift. Existing methods treat this shift as a single quantity addressed by uniform alignment or single-site editing. We challenge this view on two counts: (i) domain shift in VLM trajectory planners is inherently structured across modality and layer, and (ii) a locate-then-repair recipe matched to this structure outperforms every uniform-objective baseline. We analyse domain shift via activation patching and uncover two regularities. (F1) Modality axis. Image and text tokens exhibit distinct shift patterns in each VLM. (F2) Layer axis. The layer-wise shift partition is architecture-dependent and dataset-stable. These findings recast domain shift as a two-dimensional tensor indexed by modality (image vs. text tokens) and layer, motivating a simple principle: locate where shift occurs, and repair only there. We instantiate this principle in MoLaRx (Modality-Layer Repair), a locate-then-repair framework. The Causal Importance Score (CIS) estimates the domain shift as a modality-layer tensor and partitions the layers into functional zones. CIS-Guided Selective Repair (CISR) then applies a matched operator (Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) / low-rank adaptation (LoRA) / freezing) to repair each zone, with the composition adapting automatically to each architecture. We evaluate MoLaRx on three architecturally distinct VLMs (LFM2-VL-1.6B, Qwen2-VL-2B, and PaliGemma2-3B) across two cross-city benchmarks (nuScenes and Argoverse 2). MoLaRx attains the lowest cross-city trajectory-error gap among adaptation methods in all six main-table settings, while using 50-60% fewer trainable parameters and 8.4-10.9 ms lower inference latency. In contrast, uniform MMD-only adaptation collapses in all six settings, highlighting the importance of structure-guided repair.

作者备注:Accepted at NeurIPS 2026 (Main Track). 30 pages, 7 figures, 16 tables. Code: https://github.com/ZhihongCui/MoLaRx

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-07 21:28 · 最新观测版本

Locating and Repairing Domain Shift in VLM Trajectory Planning

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly adopted as end-to-end driving planners, yet they suffer from cross-city domain shift. Existing methods treat this shift as a single quantity addressed by uniform alignment or single-site editing. We challenge this view on two counts: (i) domain shift in VLM trajectory planners is inherently structured across modality and layer, and (ii) a locate-then-repair recipe matched to this structure outperforms every uniform-objective baseline. We analyse domain shift via activation patching and uncover two regularities. (F1) Modality axis. Image and text tokens exhibit distinct shift patterns in each VLM. (F2) Layer axis. The layer-wise shift partition is architecture-dependent and dataset-stable. These findings recast domain shift as a two-dimensional tensor indexed by modality (image vs. text tokens) and layer, motivating a simple principle: locate where shift occurs, and repair only there. We instantiate this principle in MoLaRx (Modality-Layer Repair), a locate-then-repair framework. The Causal Importance Score (CIS) estimates the domain shift as a modality-layer tensor and partitions the layers into functional zones. CIS-Guided Selective Repair (CISR) then applies a matched operator (Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) / low-rank adaptation (LoRA) / freezing) to repair each zone, with the composition adapting automatically to each architecture. We evaluate MoLaRx on three architecturally distinct VLMs (LFM2-VL-1.6B, Qwen2-VL-2B, and PaliGemma2-3B) across two cross-city benchmarks (nuScenes and Argoverse 2). MoLaRx attains the lowest cross-city trajectory-error gap among adaptation methods in all six main-table settings, while using 50-60% fewer trainable parameters and 8.4-10.9 ms lower inference latency. In contrast, uniform MMD-only adaptation collapses in all six settings, highlighting the importance of structure-guided repair.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗