跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.10774 · v1

Same Measurements, Different Velocity Risk: Complementary Rolling-Shutter Readouts under Clock Uncertainty

首次提交 2026-11-07 23:00
版本更新 2026-11-07 23:00
雷达观测 2026-11-10 11:14
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Camera rigs with identical measurement budgets can have different velocity estimation rates when exposure timing is uncertain. We establish this distinction for rolling-shutter reconstruction with two calibrated moving anchors, unknown scene points, and independently unknown auxiliary poses and clocks. On the same fixed local physical class near a separated lateral rig, repeated readouts have worst-case squared velocity risk at least of order $σρ_{\mathrm{eff}}$, whereas complementary readouts have minimax risk of order $σ^2$, for a fixed admissible clock displacement $ρ_{\mathrm{eff}}>0$ as the noise standard deviation $σ$ tends to zero. A finite physical compensation path gives the lower bound; a nonlinear velocity inverse proves complementary stability. All motion, structure, pose, and clock nuisances remain unknown. We identify mounting configurations in which both designs become regular and quantify the risk floor induced by metric uncertainty. We quantify full-parameter domains with independent 6-ms clocks and test in-domain reconstruction under paired noise and a depth-offset intervention. Raster studies examine image formation and calibration sensitivity.

作者备注:36 pages, including appendices. Lunshuo Tian and Dongheng Liu contributed equally

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-07 23:00 · 最新观测版本

Same Measurements, Different Velocity Risk: Complementary Rolling-Shutter Readouts under Clock Uncertainty

Camera rigs with identical measurement budgets can have different velocity estimation rates when exposure timing is uncertain. We establish this distinction for rolling-shutter reconstruction with two calibrated moving anchors, unknown scene points, and independently unknown auxiliary poses and clocks. On the same fixed local physical class near a separated lateral rig, repeated readouts have worst-case squared velocity risk at least of order $σρ_{\mathrm{eff}}$, whereas complementary readouts have minimax risk of order $σ^2$, for a fixed admissible clock displacement $ρ_{\mathrm{eff}}>0$ as the noise standard deviation $σ$ tends to zero. A finite physical compensation path gives the lower bound; a nonlinear velocity inverse proves complementary stability. All motion, structure, pose, and clock nuisances remain unknown. We identify mounting configurations in which both designs become regular and quantify the risk floor induced by metric uncertainty. We quantify full-parameter domains with independent 6-ms clocks and test in-domain reconstruction under paired noise and a depth-offset intervention. Raster studies examine image formation and calibration sensitivity.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗